The wife of a former Spartak Moscow leader weighs in on the possibility of Dmitry Alenichev returning to the capital club. Zarema Salikhova, closely tied to the club’s recent history, comments on what would help the team move forward at this moment and why a switch now might not be ideal for the squad or the fan base.
Over the past three seasons, Spartak has shown genuine progress. The squad has developed together, maturing on the pitch and sharpening their mental edge. The players have grown more versatile and resilient, adapting their style to different opponents and match situations. This evolution has translated into more consistent performances and a clearer sense of identity for the team as a whole.
Against that backdrop, Salikhova suggests that it may be wiser for Alenichev, Titov, and other potential recruits to refrain from joining immediately. Allow the current group to continue building confidence and cohesion. She emphasizes that the fans deserve to witness the team’s ongoing development and stability, rather than abrupt changes that could disrupt the rhythm that has been established this season.
In this period of transition, Guillermo Abascal has taken the helm at Spartak. His recent stint included time at Volos in Greece and Basel in Switzerland, experiences that have shaped his approach to coaching at a high level. With the global political climate presenting uncertainties, rumors have circulated about the Spaniard’s future with the Moscow club. Yet the club’s representatives have stated that Abascal will remain in charge through the winter, focusing on strengthening the squad and maintaining the momentum built earlier in the season.
After 17 rounds in the Russian Premier League, Spartak sits six points behind the league leaders, a gap that signals both challenge and opportunity. Zenit continues to lead, while Rostov sits in the top trio as the season progresses. The club’s strategic plan remains tied to disciplined defense, creative attack, and a balanced roster capable of delivering results across different competitions.
Meanwhile, in a different arena of sport and policy, a former member of Russia’s State Duma offered commentary on remarks from the Mayor of Paris regarding Russian athletes. Anne Hidalgo voiced opposition to Russian participation under neutral status for the upcoming Olympic Games in Paris, while suggesting that athletes might compete under a refugee banner. This stance has sparked discussion about how international events navigate political considerations and the rights of athletes to compete, regardless of nationality or current geopolitical tensions. The conversation underscores the broader environment in which Russian teams and athletes operate, highlighting the intersection of sports, diplomacy, and global audiences.