Shubenkov reacts to Coe’s stance on Russian athletes and Paris 2024
The 2015 world champion in the 110 meters hurdles, Sergei Shubenkov, recently commented on statements made by Sebastian Coe, the president of World Athletics, regarding the participation of Russian competitors at the Paris 2024 Olympic Games. Shubenkov indicated that he was not surprised by Coe’s remarks and suggested that no further comments should be expected from the federation’s leadership on this issue, as reported by DEA News.
Shubenkov pointed out that even if the International Olympic Committee grants permission for Russian athletes to compete, World Athletics could still hold its own views on the matter. He emphasized that opinions within the sport’s governing bodies vary and that Coe’s perspective is not the final word for all stakeholders involved. According to him, the discussions are complex and ongoing, with multiple authorities weighing their positions before any definitive stance is taken.
Historically, the situation has been shaped by broader geopolitical decisions. In late February 2022, the International Olympic Committee issued guidance to international sports federations suggesting that Russian and Belarusian athletes should generally be excluded from competition. This guidance has influenced debates about eligibility and competition across many sports, including track and field. The Paris Games are scheduled to run from July 26 to August 11, marking a major milestone for athletes and federations navigating the evolving policy landscape.
Shubenkov’s remarks come amid continued discourse on national representation and eligibility rules. The debate is not solely about performance or competitive readiness; it also touches on how international sports bodies interpret sanctions, eligibility, and fair play in the context of global events. The discussion remains active as stakeholders weigh the implications for athletes, national teams, and the integrity of elite sport. As negotiations unfold, athletes and officials alike are watching closely for any official directions that could affect who competes and under what flag.
Additional commentary has emerged from other figures in the sports administration sphere. Stanislav Pozdnyakov, a former sports official in another role, has accused World Athletics leadership of Russophobia—an accusation that underscores the charged atmosphere surrounding governance in international athletics. The ongoing dialogue illustrates how political pressure can intersect with sport governance, shaping the narrative around future competitions and eligibility criteria for athletes from affected regions. The Paris Games, with their historical significance and high competitive stakes, remain a focal point for all parties involved as they navigate these complex relationships and policy decisions.