Russian Vice President Igor Levitin discussed the potential for Russian athletes to return to international competitions, outlining a clear expectation that such participation will resume in due course. He emphasized that the current moment is transitional but not permanent, and that a future return is within reach.
Levitin acknowledged the turbulent phase currently affecting Russian sport, noting that even top officials have spoken about the challenges faced. He pointed out that many countries maintain a supportive stance toward Russian athletes, which he views as a hopeful signal for renewed engagement on the global stage. This optimism rests on the belief that the governing bodies, federations, and state institutions will align to facilitate participation in major events again.
He stressed the central importance of athletes having the opportunity to compete internationally. While concerns remain about the optics and logistics of a return, Levitin underscored the collective effort required from ministries, the public relations council, the sports federations, and affiliated organizations to ensure a pathway back to competition for Russian athletes. According to him, the goal is not only to resume competition but to do so in a way that preserves fairness, integrity, and the spirit of sport as a universal language that transcends borders.
In context, the International Olympic Committee had previously advised sports federations to consider allowing Russian athletes to participate under neutral status. This recommendation, issued on January 25, was followed by several federations in disciplines such as fencing, boxing, wrestling, and taekwondo, which have moved to permit Russian competitors to take part in their events under neutral labels. The shift reflects a broader debate about how to balance competitive opportunities with political considerations, while maintaining a level playing field for all athletes.
Earlier remarks from Viktor Maigurov, the head of the Russian Biathlon Union, suggested that Russian biathletes are prepared and eager to return to international competition. His comments echoed the viewpoint that athletes themselves are ready for action and view international events as essential platforms for demonstrating skill, resilience, and national representation. The conversation surrounding return efforts remains nuanced, with discussions focusing on eligibility, neutral status, and the continuing role of national sports authorities in coordinating the process for athletes who aspire to compete again on the world stage.