In Moscow on October 10, the open practice session of the Russian national football team drew fans and media attention as doping officers from RUSADA arrived on site. Veronika Loginova, the director general of the Russian Anti-Doping Agency, stressed that the event itself remained unaffected. She challenged false press reports and explained that no training was postponed or canceled because of the visit. According to Loginova, RUSADA waits for the session to conclude before carrying out any doping controls, and there is no friction with the federation; RFU leadership does not issue hostile calls, and dialogue between the two bodies remains constructive. These remarks were shared at the sports power forum organized by ODDS.ru.
Loginova outlined the standard approach for doping controls during open team practices. The presence of RUSADA staff is meant to safeguard fairness and integrity, not to disrupt the flow of football drills. Tests are scheduled to occur after the training wraps up, ensuring players can complete their work with fans and media before the process begins. The whole procedure is designed to be discreet and respectful of the players and the coaching staff. The message from the agency emphasized that doping procedures are routine, routine checks are integrated into the training cycle, and communication with the RFU is clear and collaborative. This was conveyed during her remarks at the ODDS.ru forum, where she highlighted ongoing cooperation with the federation and the sport’s governing structure.
The open session for the national team took place in Moscow, with October’s schedule focusing on practical preparation and team cohesion. The RFU faced challenges in selecting a suitable opponent for a friendly match, which elevated the training camp to the central event of the month for the country’s top squad. As a result, observers watched closely how the team adapted to different tactical drills, press conferences, and fan engagement during the public session. The event illustrated a broader effort to maintain competitive readiness in a period of scheduling uncertainty, while still ensuring regulatory procedures remained in place for fair play and athlete welfare.
Earlier comments from Guberniev indicated his view of a potential run for the presidency of the Russian Olympic Committee. He suggested himself as a strong candidate to lead the national Olympic body, signaling the broader landscape of athletic administration and political considerations surrounding sport in Russia. The remark added another layer to the conversations surrounding Russia’s sports governance, alongside ongoing efforts by agencies like RUSADA to uphold integrity and transparency within the World Anti-Doping Code framework and national sport programs. This context helps readers understand how doping controls, federation decisions, and leadership aspirations interact within the country’s high-performance sports ecosystem, as discussed in the public sphere and media forums.