The decision to ban Russian football referees from officiating matches that feature visible tattoos has sparked confusion among observers. This view comes from an interview with Dmitry Bulykin, a former forward for Lokomotiv and the Russian national team, as published by RuNews24 in a summarized form.
Bulykin pointed out that not only referees but also many players wear tattoos in today’s game. He argued that tattoos should not be a disqualifying factor for referees, players, or other match officials. He said he does not mind the designs or locations of tattoos on any participant. What matters, he suggested, is the ability to evaluate players and referees fairly and consistently. While he personally would prefer fewer visible tattoos, he acknowledged that some athletes go with facial or neck ink and that such choices are personal decisions. He emphasized that a fair assessment should prevail over any cosmetic concerns that may arise from visible body art (citation: RuNews24 interview summary). The core question, in his view, is whether tattoo visibility affects impartial judgment on the field, and he remains unconvinced that tattoos should impede someone’s professional duties (citation: RuNews24 interview summary).
Recent reporting from Sports Express indicated that referees were informed not to officiate matches where visible tattoos might be seen by the audience. The guidance also noted that referees, assistants, substitutes, VARs, and ABARs should remove jewelry or piercing prior to the match. The policy appears to require all decorative items to be out of sight during competition, a rule that some critics say adds unnecessary scrutiny to what should be a straightforward assessment of performance and fitness for duty (citation: Sports Express coverage). The intent behind such rules seems to be presenting a uniform, distraction-free appearance on the field, though opinions differ on whether this serves the sport’s best interests (citation: Sports Express coverage).
Observers note that Krasnodar is an ongoing contender, reportedly holding a secure second place in the Russian Premier League, and questions about officiating standards some say deserve careful study in the broader context of league administration and international perception. Critics argue that focus should center on decision accuracy, consistent application of rules, and the readiness of officials to enforce safety and integrity on match days, rather than on cosmetic considerations that may or may not influence performance (citation: league coverage and commentary).