uncertain to the end
Germany’s run in the World Cup qualifier ended in a dramatic scene against Latvia, with the Baltic squad pushing hard and fighting until the final whistle. Latvia carried a clear plan and the fight to stay alive, earning three times as many chances as the German side in the closing minutes. Kristaps Porzingis, though not on the court for Latvia in this moment, hung in the minds of fans as a symbol of what Latvia could achieve, while the rest of the team kept pressing from start to finish. The German bench, by contrast, showed moments of cautious energy, with Maodo Lo and others entering as substitutes to help steady the lineup—Schröder repeatedly tried to spark play but faced a tough defensive test. The result was a contest where momentum swung, and the crowd witnessed a game that lived up to its hype.
Latvia’s trio of stars carried the weight of the scoring load with Bertans delivering a standout performance, spearheading efforts that kept Latvia within reach. Zagars, contributing 24 points and eight assists, played a pivotal role in orchestrating Latvia’s offense and keeping pace with a resourceful German squad. Their combined play energized a Latvian team that demonstrated resilience and an ability to rise to the occasion against an opponent with greater depth. The narrative centered on how Latvia managed to stay competitive against a team with more institutional depth and a longer run of success on big stages.
Heading into the quarterfinals, Latvia appeared to be the team with the sharper dynamics, showing mental fortitude and relentless engagement from the opening tip. The early exchanges reflected a back-and-forth battle, with Latvia asserting pressure and taking the initiative at various moments. Bertans moved with a heightened sense of urgency; Zagars matched pace with precision, and the on-court chemistry began to push Germany into uncomfortable positions. This balance between offense and defense suggested Latvia’s capability to disrupt the German rhythm and force mistakes at crucial junctures.
On the other side, Germany kept their engine idling at first, then tried to surge with a stronger second unit featuring Lo, Thiemann, and the Wagner brothers. Schroder, bearing the responsibility of leading the offense, faced a defense that tightened its grip as the game wore on. His work—along with the collective effort of Theis and Bonga—proved instrumental but could not fully dismantle Latvia’s cohesive performance. A stretch of missed opportunities and stubborn resistance defined the German approach as the match moved into the late stages.
uncertain to the end
The pace slowed, and Germany found it harder to sustain the electric rhythm that Latvia had used to keep its rivals off balance. Latvia’s late-game defense tightened, and Bertans, along with Zagars, kept the scoring pulse alive when it mattered most. The Latvian pair delivered two critical three-pointers in quick succession, illustrating their willingness to take responsibility in crunch time and to push back against German pressure. The momentum that Latvia built during these moments told a larger story about endurance and character under pressure. The scoreline hovered around a one-possession difference as the final minutes approached, keeping spectators on edge and underscoring the drama of a tightly contested qualifier.
As the fourth quarter unfolded, Latvia’s physical stamina and willingness to press up the floor began to tell. The Baltic quintet balanced aggression with discipline, stretching the German defense and forcing mistakes that kept Latvia within striking distance. Even when the German offense tried to pull away, Latvia found ways to answer—through efficient ball movement, timely screens, and the unyielding efforts of Zagars and Bertans. The drama persisted until the last minute, with Latvia showing the heart that fans had hoped to see all tournament long.
In the final analysis, the scoreboard reflected a balanced battle. Latvia posted solid numbers across key categories, with Zagars leading the way in assists and Bertans providing the clutch scoring. Latvia’s five-man rotation demonstrated depth and determination, while Germany relied on a steady backbone of Schröder’s playmaking and a disciplined defensive plan. The result left both teams with credit as they navigated a season full of high expectations and intense competition.
Germany: Schröder, Obst, Bonga, Theis, Voigtmann — starting five; Lo, Wagner, Wagner, Hollatz, Thiemann, Kramer — reserve squad
Latvia: Zagars, Grazulis, Kurucs, Smits, Bertans — starting five; Strautins, Kurucs, Zoriks, Cavars, Skeleton — reserves
13 of 34 from three-point range for Latvia and 35 rebounds overall highlighted a game that demanded relentless effort on both ends of the floor. Latvia’s assists showed leadership by Zagars, while the team’s low turnovers helped maintain a steady offensive rhythm. The contest also marked a showcase for Bertans, who demonstrated how a single player’s scoring presence can tilt a game when teammates feed opportunities and create space for him to operate. The narrative of this game reinforced Latvia’s identity as a squad capable of competing with larger basketball nations on the world stage, a detail noted by observers and analysts in the post-game discussions. (Citations: tournament reports and game summaries from official federation sources.)