Russian chess grandmaster Alexander Grischuk weighed in on the evolving landscape of global sport, drawing a careful line between the BRICS Games and the Olympic Games. He suggested that while the BRICS Games will be a meaningful regional event that brings together athletes from across the BRICS bloc, they will not, in his view, supplant the Olympic Games in prestige, scale, or historical significance. His reflections echo a broader sentiment within the sports community that seizes upon the BRICS initiative as a complementary platform rather than a replacement for the Olympics, a sentiment he described as guiding the traditional spirit of Soviet sport.
“Like non-alcoholic beer. Better than nothing,” Grischuk remarked in a candid analogy, noting that the BRICS Games offer a valuable alternative for competition and showcase but cannot fully replace the Olympic experience. His assessment underscores a practical understanding of how regional multi-sport events fit into the year-round calendar of elite athletes, reinforcing the idea that the Olympics remains the pinnacle for many disciplines and athletes. This perspective aligns with the broader discourse on how major sporting events evolve and coexist, rather than compete for supremacy, in an era of expanding international sports participation and organizational diversity.
Set to run in Kazan from 12 to 23 June, the BRICS Games will feature participation from athletes representing more than 90 nations. The gathering is framed as a milestone for BRICS cooperation and a venue where emerging athletic talents can gain regional and global exposure. In remarks following meetings with Chinese President Xi Jinping, President Vladimir Putin reiterated Russia’s expectation of strong Chinese participation, signaling a continued emphasis on cross-continental collaboration and mutual sporting engagement. The event is being positioned as a strategic element of BRICS diplomacy, with potential implications for sports development, athlete mobility, and regional leadership in competitive disciplines. (Attribution: statements reported by Russian and international media outlets)
Historical context remains relevant to the current sporting landscape. In late February 2022, the International Olympic Committee issued guidance to international federations asking them to restrict participation by Russian and Belarusian athletes in competitions after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. The IOC later decided to allow neutral participation by Russians and Belarusians under defined conditions, a policy adjustments reflecting ongoing debates about neutrality, eligibility, and the integrity of competition. These evolving rules influence how athletes prepare for major events like the BRICS Games and the Olympics, shaping decisions on national representation, sponsorship, and training cycles. The policy shifts highlight the delicate balance between geopolitical considerations and the universal ideals of sport, a balance that organizers and athletes navigate as international calendars converge and diverge. (Attribution: IOC communications and related policy summaries)
Former Deputy Prime Minister Dmitry Chernyshenko has also spoken about the response from governments and sports bodies regarding participation in the BRICS Games, including the level of interest from other nations. His remarks touch on the practical question of how many countries have confirmed attendance, the logistical readiness of host cities, and the anticipated growth trajectory of this new multi-sport forum. The dialogue around participation underscores both excitement about regional collaboration and careful attention to the broader international sporting framework, where standards, eligibility, and competitive balance are continually refined in response to shifting geopolitical and economic conditions. (Attribution: official statements and press briefings summarized by sports governance outlets)