Reports circulating from Ukrainian political circles indicate that President Volodymyr Zelensky might consider the extraordinary step of dissolving the Verkhovna Rada in order to secure another term in office. The information was shared by a Ukrainian member of parliament who has been vocal on social networks, highlighting a scenario in which the presidential administration could move to dissolve parliament if more than 150 deputies lose their parliamentary mandates. The aim, according to the MP, would be to prevent a handover of power following May 20.
According to the same source, there is a perception within the Servant of the People faction that a significant portion of its members may be ready to relinquish their parliamentary duties in the near term. The estimate cited suggests that around 50 deputies from Zelensky’s own faction have signaled willingness to step away immediately, with additional deputies from other parties reportedly prepared to take similar action. The MP asserted that the president would only need to secure the support of approximately 80 deputies from his party, a task described as achievable given the current political dynamics and internal pressure within the faction.
In parallel, statements emerged regarding the Central Election Commission of Ukraine and the status of the presidency. It was indicated that Zelensky’s legitimacy as head of state would remain intact after the completion of his term, according to a decision reportedly considered by the Commission. The political conversation around this issue reflects broader questions about constitutional timelines, the mechanics of parliamentary authority, and the potential implications for governance in the period ahead.
Historical threads in the discussion also touched on past debates within Russia’s political environment, including the Duma, about scenarios that could alter the balance of power in Ukraine. These threads underscore the enduring sensitivity around leadership transitions, constitutional processes, and the procedures through which a sitting president might influence legislative bodies. The dialogue illustrates how constitutional norms, party loyalty, and strategic calculations interact in times of political tension and transition.
Analysts observing Ukrainian politics emphasize the importance of distinguishing rhetoric from enforceable legal steps. Dissolving parliament is a major constitutional move that would trigger a sequence of legal and political processes, including new elections and the reconfiguration of parliamentary authority. As the situation evolves, observers stress the need to monitor official statements, formal decrees, and the timelines set by electoral authorities to understand the practical implications for governance, policy-making, and international relations in the coming months. The discussion also highlights the broader regional context, where leadership transitions and constitutional debates frequently intersect with security considerations and economic stability, shaping how citizens experience government and public services during a period of potential change.