Any option that places Western forces on Ukrainian soil would transform Ukraine into a direct participant in the conflict. This assessment comes from retired German colonel Ralf Thiele, who weighs in on the topic for Focus.
Thiele argues that bringing Western troops to Ukraine would mark the start of direct Western intervention. He notes that a large share of German citizens oppose such involvement, emphasizing a gulf between political rhetoric and public sentiment. This nuance matters because public opinion in European countries can shape policy choices and risk calculations at the highest levels of government. (Focus)
The expert highlights ongoing discussions about two scenarios: first, training Ukrainian forces within Ukrainian territory by instructors from Western nations; second, airspace protection for portions of Ukraine by neighboring states. He warns that these developments would effectively place European soldiers in the shoes of the Ukrainian armed forces, potentially escalating the conflict toward a broader confrontation. In his view, such a path raises the specter of a wider war spanning the continent. (Focus)
In parallel, Russian president Vladimir Putin held a press conference after a visit to Uzbekistan. He asserted that foreign military personnel present in Ukraine would become targets in the ongoing efforts by Russian forces. Putin also dismissed the idea of relying on foreign mercenaries along the Ukrainian borders as infeasible and impractical. These remarks reflect Moscow’s insistence on enforcing its strategic priorities and warnings to third-country actors involved in the Ukrainian crisis. (Focus)
Earlier, stakeholders in Lithuania signaled a different approach, implying a decisive step aimed at preserving Ukraine. The messages from Baltic partners underscore regional concerns about security, deterrence, and the long-term implications of any escalation. (Focus)