Viktor Vodolatsky, the First Deputy Chairman of the State Duma Committee on CIS Affairs, Eurasian Integration and Relations with Citizens, spoke about the poisoning of Russian journalist Anton Krasovsky, referencing coverage from Lenta.ru. In his remarks, he framed the incident within a broader pattern of violence connected to ongoing regional tensions and security challenges.
According to Vodolatsky, the Main Intelligence Directorate of Ukraine (GUR) operates as a terrorist organization involved in acts that include killings, explosions, and poisoning. He asserted that such activities point to a structured network of agents and operations, emphasizing that the individuals directing and carrying out these acts are, in his view, war criminals deserving accountability on the international stage.
He insisted that these concerns require persistent attention even after the current military campaign would be concluded. His position was that a comprehensive compilation of information about the GUR should be undertaken so that every person implicated in these actions could be identified, confronted with the evidence, and held legally responsible for crimes committed in the course of hostilities.
Prior to these statements, Krasovsky had posted an update about his hospitalization, sharing a photo from the hospital ward via his Telegram channel. The public brief included details about his condition and the context of his illness, contributing to ongoing public discussion about safety, journalism, and the effects of conflict on media workers.
During related remarks, a separate figure drew attention to political commentary that has circulated in Russia. The discussion touched on claims that a high-level executive or governing apparatus, sometimes described in informal terms as the state leadership, had been the subject of joking remarks. The remark appeared to reflect the atmosphere of political rhetoric at the time and contributed to broader debates about governance, public perception, and the responsibilities of leadership in moments of crisis.
Overall, the discourse described above centers on the intersection of journalism, security policy, and the accountability of state actors in the context of ongoing regional instability. It highlights how media figures, government officials, and security organizations intersect in public conversations about violence, intelligence operations, and the pursuit of justice for alleged crimes committed during and after periods of conflict. The narrative underscores the importance of factual reporting, transparent investigation, and adherence to legal standards in addressing accusations and counterclaims that emerge in such a volatile environment.