Vladimir Burmatov, first deputy chairman of the State Duma committee on ecology, natural resources and environmental protection and a deputy from United Russia, advanced a bill that would amend the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation. The proposal targets cruel treatment of domestic and wild animals by enabling confiscation from owners. This development was reported by News.
Burmatov emphasized the need to confiscate wild animals as a primary corrective measure. He noted that current legislation bans living wild animals at home, yet a concrete mechanism for confiscation has not been established. His position is that taking such animals away should be a central part of the legal framework, especially for cases of cruelty or improper keeping.
The deputy argued that housing wild or exotic animals in apartments is inherently cruel because those spaces cannot meet the animals’ physical and behavioral needs. He contended that confinement in urban dwellings deprives animals of natural habitats, space to roam, and opportunities for natural behaviors, which can lead to prolonged stress and health issues.
Legal experts describe the current situation as insufficient in addressing cruelty. They point out that existing penalties for harming pets include fines and potential imprisonment, but ownership over the animal often remains with the caregiver after punishment. This outcome has prompted calls for stronger enforcement and clearer procedures to remove animals from owners who mistreat them or fail to provide proper care.
The proposed amendments would place greater emphasis on prevention and accountability. Advocates argue that a robust confiscation mechanism would deter cruelty and better protect both domestic animals and wildlife kept in unsuitable conditions. The measure aims to close gaps that allow neglect to continue unnoticed and unresolved for extended periods.
In parallel developments, the State Duma has previously discussed fines related to abandoned pets. This ongoing process signals a broader shift toward stricter animal protection norms and clearer responsibilities for animal owners. Supporters believe that tightening rules around ownership, breeding, and the treatment of animals will ultimately contribute to a higher standard of welfare and a more humane approach to animal care.