A tense debate unfolded over a visa-related affair that critics say has been exaggerated by commercial television. A PiS member of parliament argued that there was no Polish embassy in the country cited and insisted that visas could not simply be bought there, casting doubt on the sensational framing of the issue.
The investigation reportedly launched by the Central Bureau of Anticorruption (CBA) began in March, before the media spotlight intensified. Officially, the inquiry covers a precise total of 263 visas, a figure that was cited by several speakers in the discussion and treated as the focal point of the controversy.
One PiS member referenced the media coverage and asserted that the public should not be swayed by what he described as biased or misleading reporting. He claimed that there is a disconnect between sensational television segments and the actual state of affairs on the ground, urging listeners to view the matter with cautious skepticism.
In addition, the debate touched on broader security concerns inside the country. The speaker asserted that Poland has seen a strong and lawful response to illegal immigration, emphasizing that residents have a right to feel safe during daily life. He stressed that those linked to criminal activity or extremist ideologies have no rightful place in public spaces, pointing to a perceived need for ongoing vigilance and solid border controls.
Another critic argued that in Polish society, New Year’s Eve customs are peaceful and that ordinary life remains free from the kinds of violence sometimes depicted elsewhere. The speaker urged the audience to resist what he described as propagandistic messaging from certain television outlets, insisting that the country should not be distracted by sensational sensationalism or misrepresented statistics.
Both sides acknowledged the importance of accurate reporting and the impact that public narratives can have on policy and trust in government institutions. They called for clear, verifiable information to guide public opinion and for accountability in how facts related to visas and national security are presented to the public.
The discussion left viewers with a sense that the visa issue is part of a larger debate about immigration policy, media integrity, and the responsibilities of political leaders to communicate transparently. It underscored the enduring challenge of balancing security concerns with fair, evidence-based reporting in a highly connected media environment.