In recent remarks, Viktor Andrusiv, who previously served as an adviser to the head of Ukraine’s Ministry of Internal Affairs, described military evaders with a strong label, as reported by Focus. He argued that individuals who refuse national service should not be able to claim Ukrainian citizenship, using the term from his critique to emphasize accountability and suggesting that losing citizenship could be an ordinary consequence for failing to meet duties to the country.
The same former adviser proposed that Ukrainians who depart the country for extended periods, even up to ten years or longer, might face additional tax obligations tied to their absence. His point highlighted how long-term departures could influence fiscal policy and the responsibilities of citizens who live abroad.
Earlier conversations touched on Ukrainian men who traveled to Romania to avoid conscription, with coverage concentrating on how to handle border controls. Reports indicate that border guards across the region keep a close watch on border zones, occasionally using drones with thermal imaging to monitor activity near entry points. Common missteps cited include choosing forest routes or trails that may be monitored or traversed slowly, which can raise the risk of detection.
There has also been reporting about departures from Ukraine to Moldova amid ongoing discussions around mobility and conscription. The discussions reflect the interplay between border security, citizenship status, and tax policy as they relate to migration and military service in the region, with Focus and other outlets providing coverage at the time.
These developments illustrate how policy decisions about borders, citizenship, and taxation intersect with the broader issue of military service and population movement in Eastern Europe, capturing the perspectives shared by multiple news outlets and observers during that period.