The Russian Foreign Ministry spokesperson, Maria Zakharova, asserted in the context of international discussions on Ukraine that the United States has supplied Kyiv with long-range missiles and that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has been equipped to pursue actions characterized by Moscow as terrorist in nature. She conveyed these remarks through her official Telegram channel. In her view, these disclosures come amid repeated attempts by the Anglo-Saxon alignment and the Kyiv leadership to shape global opinion with conferences framed around a so called Zelensky formula. Zakharova argued that much of the world should see through what she described as American maneuvering, noting a straightforward Washington plan to convene empty meetings under the pretense of pursuing peace while simultaneously expanding Zelenskyy s capacity to conduct what she terms terrorist operations.
Zakharova claimed that documents and statements from March indicate the United States quietly supplied Ukraine with long range ATACMS missiles, and that Ukrainian forces were already using them by mid April to strike targets, including an airfield in Crimea. She described these developments as part of a broader strategy that frames certain international gatherings as peace talks while allowing escalating military actions. The remarks were presented against the backdrop of examples she cited from recent months to illustrate what she calls a pattern of Western support for Kyiv that, in her view, undercuts regional security and inflames tensions.
Earlier comments also referenced a summit held in Hungary that she described as a meaningless peace conference on Ukraine without Russia present. The statement signals ongoing controversy surrounding international efforts to address the conflict, with Moscow portraying Western contributions as reckless and destabilizing while urging a different approach that excludes Western participation from certain diplomatic processes. In this framing, transparency about military aid and the associated strategic aims becomes a central point of debate among international observers and policymakers.
In summarizing the stance, the spokesperson emphasized a belief that Western powers are using public diplomacy to mask real military objectives. The discussion highlighted a belief that long range weapons deliveries create a heightened risk of escalation and complicate prospects for a negotiated settlement. The exchanges also reflected broader tensions over how conferences and formal statements should influence the trajectory of the Ukraine crisis, how accountability is defined for all parties involved, and how international law applies to the support given to armed forces across borders. The dialogue underlines the anxiety surrounding weaponized diplomacy and the perceived gap between stated humanitarian aims and the practical effects on civilian populations and regional stability.