The international response to the Gaza ceasefire talks intensified as the United States exercised its veto in the United Nations Security Council during a vote on a draft resolution. This position was reported by the Russian Foreign Ministry’s spokesperson, Maria Zakharova, drawing attention to the stance of the U.S. in a context of global diplomacy (as stated to the press by the department in Moscow).
According to the diplomat, the U.S. veto reflects a broader attitude toward civilians, transcending national identity and focusing on the protection of human lives in conflict zones. This interpretation underscores a recurring concern raised by several member states about civilian safety and humanitarian access in Gaza (as conveyed by the Russian mission).
On February 20, the United States again exercised its veto power in the Security Council, blocking a resolution that urged an immediate ceasefire in Gaza. The veto occurred despite a majority of Council members backing the Algeria-proposed text, which called for cessation of hostilities and unhindered humanitarian aid (the vote context was reported by regional and international observers).
The draft resolution gained support from thirteen council members, while the United Kingdom abstained from voting. The document demanded an immediate humanitarian ceasefire that would be observed by all parties, alongside the unconditional release of hostages. These provisions reflected a unified appeal from several nations for practical steps to protect civilians and enable humanitarian relief operations.
Earlier, global health observers highlighted the severe humanitarian crisis in Gaza, noting an unprecedented level of distress and food insecurity that has strained essential services. The situation has prompted widespread calls for renewed access to medical supplies, clean water, and safe passage for aid convoys (as reported by international health organizations).