The United States government remains skeptical about China’s peace proposals for the Ukraine crisis. This view was conveyed by Ned Price, the spokesperson for the State Department, during a briefing with reporters. The remarks were reported by TASS as part of ongoing coverage of this issue.
During the briefing, Price was asked to comment on Beijing’s plan to outline a peace framework for Ukraine. He indicated that the Chinese side appears to be pursuing a dual path. According to him, Beijing seeks to maintain a neutral stance while simultaneously offering meaningful support to Russia in its military actions. Price described the assistance as economic, diplomatic, and political in nature.
Price added that these signals prompt concern when there is talk about a concrete peace plan from the PRC. The United States sees the possibility of such a framework, but remains doubtful about its intent and impact given the broader context of the conflict and existing sanctions and alignments.
In a related note, Victoria Nuland, the U S Undersecretary of State for Political Affairs, gave an interview to a major domestic newspaper in which she discussed the administration’s approach to Ukraine and potential military aid. She referenced ongoing discussions with allies about the prospect of supplying fourth and fifth generation fighter aircraft to Ukraine. The interview also touched on plans for a new sanctions package against Russia, slated for announcement in the near term. Nuland’s comments were summarized in coverage by public media and other outlets, reflecting the administration’s broader strategy toward the conflict.
Observers note that Washington remains committed to coordinating with partners and allies to deter aggression and to support Ukraine’s sovereignty while weighing the implications of any foreign policy moves, including technology transfers and sanctions. The United States continues to emphasize a measured approach that aims to strengthen Ukraine’s defense capabilities while keeping pressure on Moscow through coordinated international action. These developments are part of a larger discussion about how global powers respond to the war and what kinds of peace proposals might be viable, credible, and effective in practice. All statements from U S officials are subject to evolving policy reviews and ongoing diplomatic conversations among allies. Attribution: official briefings, major domestic outlets, and international coverage.