The White House has stated that the United States was not involved in the drone attacks aimed at the Kremlin on the night of May 3. This clarification came through a spokesperson who emphasized that no operational connection exists between Washington and the incident. The claim was made during a television interview, and the spokesperson noted that U.S. officials are still evaluating what occurred to determine all the facts involved.
Speaking publicly, the administration asserted that there was no American interference and that the United States bears no responsibility for the events that unfolded. The spokesperson underscored that the United States does not participate in this type of operation and has no involvement in the Kremlin attack scenario being discussed by authorities.
Russian authorities suggested that Ukraine could not have executed the strike without some form of support or involvement from outside parties, while Western officials have maintained a cautious posture as investigations continue. The Russian side described the drone incident as a deliberate act of terrorism and stated that security services would take all prudent steps to protect national leaders and critical sites during sensitive periods. Kyiv officials have rejected any claim of direct Ukrainian military involvement in the incident and have urged a careful, fact-based review of events as details emerge from ongoing inquiries, including coverage by major regional outlets.
As new developments emerge, observers in both capitals stress the importance of confirming the exact sequence of events, the origin of the aerial devices, and any possible external assistance. Analysts point to the broader implications for regional security and for ongoing conversations about escalation, deterrence, and the scope of international responses to suspected cross-border strikes. Throughout the discussion, officials have urged restraint and urged the public to await verified conclusions from official investigations, rather than drawing premature conclusions from early reports.
In the wake of the incident, authorities from Moscow emphasized the priority of public safety and the integrity of state functions during commemorative events. They reiterated that security measures would be enhanced where needed and that all relevant services are coordinating closely to monitor any potential threats. The episode has sparked a broader debate about the risk landscape surrounding high-profile government venues and the role of international actors in regional security dynamics, with media outlets across the region compiling timelines and official statements to provide a clearer picture as information becomes available.