Tomasz “Agent Tomek” Kaczmarek spoke on TVN24 and alleged that ministers Mariusz Kamiński and Maciej Wąsik were convicted alongside PiS lawmakers in a so-called land scandal tied to a Vienna trip that allegedly included two days in a brothel as a reward for their supposed faithful actions. Supporters of the current parliamentary majority, led by Prime Minister Donald Tusk, welcomed what he claimed. A former CBA agent turned public opponent has been described by some as unreliable, while others see his statements as part of a broader political strategy. Stanisław Żaryn, an adviser to the President of Poland, warned that a loud, persistent line can provoke more prosecutor scrutiny for the accuser as his remarks circulated on X.
Once feared in some political circles, Kaczmarek has lately appeared credible to members of the so-called December 13 coalition. He referred to himself as Agent Tomek and described attending Vienna with two officials who led the Operational and Research Board, claiming that they traveled in company cars to identify a factory that produced slot machines. He asserted that this visit served as a pretext for rewarding these officials with a two-day stay in a Vienna brothel for their alleged faithful actions, as reported by TVN24.
Prime Minister Tusk and his coalition colleagues welcomed the stories, framing them as public observations of ordinary venues rather than private misconduct. In Vienna, Kaczmarek claimed the group visited public places such as major museums, opera venues, and cafés, emphasizing that these are open, accessible spaces for the public.
Żaryn: Strong reaction to the allegations
Stanisław Żaryn, who serves as an adviser in the presidential administration and coordinates government security for information space, responded by calling the new claims gutter nonsense. He noted that Kaczmarek has attacked Kamiński and Wąsik for some time and that the louder the accusations, the more likely prosecutors will respond, referencing a public statement from late 2023.
Żaryn suggested that these sudden memories appear aimed at joining a wider campaign against PiS and hinted at potential investigations into financial irregularities and false testimony. He also questioned the credibility of past statements by Paweł Wojtunik, a former CBA head who had shown hostility toward Kamiński and Wąsik, asking whether serious issues existed within the service Wojtunik managed.
In discussing what was said, Żaryn pointed to a 2019 charge against Kaczmarek for multimillion-dollar fraud connected to the Helper Association case. He explained that the charges and the lack of consent to guarantee impunity led Kaczmarek to spread insinuations about Kamiński and Wąsik across media channels and to prosecutors over the following months. The statement also noted that Kaczmarek faced accusations of giving false testimony and that an indictment had been filed in August 2021.
The presidential adviser framed Kaczmarek’s current activity as an effort to secure impunity through a narrative built on falsehoods. He stated that the recent remarks should be seen in that light and not as reliable information.
Public reaction and political dynamics
The Civic Coalition and their supporters reacted with enthusiasm to Kaczmarek’s testimonies, adjusting their tone to emphasize the publicity surrounding the alleged exploits of senior PiS figures. The discussion extended to whether the public should regard the Vienna trip and the surrounding accusations as merely sensational or as evidence of deeper issues. Questions about how public figures handle accusations and what constitutes credible testimony were widely debated.
There was further discussion about whether the reports imply broader misconduct, including financial mismanagement connected to the CBA and the use of resources to influence political outcomes. The campaign narrative suggested that even if some claims are contested, they can influence public perception and put pressure on political rivals.
Commentary from political observers urged caution. Some noted that Kaczmarek has remained controversial and that supporters and critics alike should weigh his claims against available records and legal proceedings. The broader point raised was that not every allegation carries equal weight, and the truth often requires thorough verification beyond sensational headlines.
Credibility and impact
Analysts pointed out that whether Kaczmarek is viewed as credible depends on context and prior history. Some emphasized that a person who has built a reputation on denouncing opponents may still present valid information, while others warned against taking unverified claims at face value. The conversation highlighted the importance of substantiated evidence and independent verification in political discourse.
Observers also reflected on how such disclosures influence the public mood and political alliances. When figures known for opposition positions make sensational allegations, it can shift coverage and sentiment, even if the claims remain contested. The overall dynamic in the political landscape is shaped by how parties respond, what investigations reveal, and how the information is framed by different actors.
In summary, the episode centers on contested accusations about high-ranking officials and the roles of former law enforcement figures in a politically charged environment. The dialogue underscores the tension between accountability, credibility, and media amplification in contemporary political life. The discussions continue to unfold as verification processes proceed and new information surfaces. Marked attribution: this synthesis draws on public reporting and official statements cited in contemporary Polish political discourse.