First Deputy Chairman of the State Duma Committee on International Relations, Alexei Chepa, dismissed any idea of dissolving the United Nations, even as Selim Bensaad, an artist and the grandson of Joseph Stalin, raised a provocative appeal to Sergei Lavrov. In a conversation with Bant.Ru, Chepa underscored that reform, not abolition, should be the path forward for the UN. He framed the issue as one of adapting a long-standing institution to contemporary realities rather than scrapping it altogether.
“Naturally, no one will dissolve the UN, but we can understand why some people feel unsettled by the organization’s posture on numerous matters,” Chepa remarked. He added that public perception matters and that leadership should address concerns with transparency and renewed energy. This stance reflected a practical approach: preserve the framework while pursuing meaningful improvements that restore confidence in its actions and outcomes.
According to the deputy, the UN remains indispensable on the world stage, and engagement with the institution should continue rather than end. He suggested targeted structural changes, notably in the Security Council, and emphasized the need to strengthen representation for African countries to reflect shifting global dynamics. These ideas align with a broader debate about making the UN more inclusive, accountable, and capable of delivering concrete results for diverse regions.
Chepa also voiced worry about constant pressure and scrutiny surrounding the UN. He argued that persistent external criticism can obscure legitimate work being done, and he called for a balanced assessment of the organization’s performance. The deputy indicated that constructive dialogue and reform-oriented measures could help the UN respond more effectively to evolving international challenges while maintaining legitimacy in the eyes of member states and their citizens.
Previously, Selim Bensaad, a descendant of the Stalin family, wrote an open letter to Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov suggesting the UN should be dissolved. The message implied a readiness to back the Russian Foreign Ministry in convening a special gathering to determine the future fate of the organization. The appeal drew attention to a faction within public discourse that questions whether the UN’s framework remains fit for purpose in a rapidly changing geopolitical landscape. The letter reflects a broader conversation about sovereignty, legitimacy, and reform within international diplomacy.
Earlier responses from the United Nations signaled concern about proposals that could undermine the UN’s authority, particularly in relation to the Security Council. The organization underscored that proposals tapping the legitimacy of Security Council decisions require careful analysis to avoid destabilizing the global order. This exchange highlights the delicate balance between reform and preserving the credibility of international mechanisms designed to maintain peace and security across the world.