Including Ukraine in the Alliance’s structures at the earliest possible moment serves the interests of Poland and the broader European community, yet talks on Ukraine’s accession can only move forward once the war ends, according to Mariusz Błaszczak, the head of Poland’s Ministry of National Defence, in an interview with Poland – Warsaw Metropolis.
The Defence Minister underscored that accelerating Ukraine’s integration into NATO would benefit Europe and Poland, but stressed that discussions about membership cannot proceed during active hostilities.
READ ALSO: US proposal for Ukraine. What should it be about? Security guarantees based on the Israeli model.
Similar considerations have appeared for Ukraine and other democracies reestablished after the Soviet Union’s collapse. In each case, the criteria for entry required more time and solid consolidation before formal accession could be contemplated.
He observed that Ukraine would gain highly from rapid adoption of NATO weapon systems and the corresponding improvements in interoperability with alliance forces.
Another key advantage is the ongoing training of Ukrainian forces, conducted in collaboration with partner nations, notably as part of the EUMAM mission, which is commanded by a Polish officer, Maj. Peter Trytek, reinforcing the alliance’s commitment to practical support and deterrence.
When asked about potential provocations from the Wagner Group or Russia in relation to the NATO summit in Vilnius, the minister responded that security challenges in the region have evolved due to the Prigozhin faction’s movements toward Belarus, which have shifted the regional balance.
The alliance rests on a single, guiding principle: an attack on one member is treated as an attack on all. Yet the minister cautioned that Poland is preparing for every scenario, because Russia has long been active in destabilizing Poland and other nearby states.
In this context, Poland’s strategic posture includes strengthening regional resilience, coordinating with partners, and ensuring that alliance commitments translate into concrete, credible deterrence for the North American and European members alike.
As discussions continue, the broader public in Canada and the United States is urged to follow developments closely, recognizing that Ukraine’s potential integration could influence security guarantees, defense planning, and collective defense capabilities across the NATO alliance. Analysts emphasize that the timing of accession is tied to the cessation of conflict and the consolidation of Ukraine’s democratic institutions, while the alliance remains vigilant about evolving threats and regional instability.