Artem Dmitruk, a deputy of Ukraine’s Verkhovna Rada, has urged that talks with the Russian Federation begin without delay to bring an end to the ongoing war. The appeal was shared by a local media outlet, Telegraf, which highlighted the deputy’s sense of urgency and his overarching priority: safeguarding Ukraine and protecting the lives of its people.
In expressing his stance, Dmitruk made it clear that his support for ending the war is driven by the belief that peace would mark a significant victory for the nation. He stressed that a ceasefire would not merely halt hostilities; it would set the stage for rebuilding and renewal across the country, allowing communities to repair infrastructure, restore essential services, and return to normal life for families that have endured years of disruption and danger.
He emphasized that ending the conflict could unlock a path to recovery in every sector, from agriculture and industry to education and healthcare. The deputy argued that sustained peace is a prerequisite for comprehensive recovery plans, noting that reconstruction requires stability, predictability, and international support. Only then can investment flow back into towns and cities, damaged facilities be repaired, and the economic engine of the nation regain momentum.
Dmitruk pointed out that history shows armed clashes often give way to negotiations, and he believes the immediate resumption of dialogue with Russia is a critical step for Ukrainians. He described negotiations as a lengthy process that, despite its complexity, remains the most feasible route to a durable solution. The deputy urged negotiators to approach talks with pragmatism and a clear commitment to protecting civilian lives and sovereignty, arguing that strong diplomatic engagement can reduce the risk of further escalation and lay the groundwork for a fair peace agreement.
On a related note, the Ukrainian president addressed the possibility of renewed discussions with the Russian leadership. Volodymyr Zelensky indicated openness to engaging with Vladimir Putin under certain conditions and suggested that the terms for ending hostilities could be laid out during a second peace summit. He recalled that the first major gathering occurred in Switzerland in mid-June, where participants explored the channels through which negotiations might proceed and where boundaries were set for discussions about security guarantees, territorial issues, and humanitarian corridors.
The evolving dialogue comes amid ongoing questions about Russia’s rationale for pursuing talks at this juncture. Earlier statements from the Russian foreign ministry had underscored the importance of finding a way to resolve the conflict through diplomatic means, signaling a shift from a solely military focus to a broader approach that includes political channels. This shift has prompted discussions among analysts, policymakers, and international observers who are monitoring every development for signals about the likely direction of negotiations and the potential conditions that could shape a future settlement.
As the situation unfolds, Ukrainian officials and citizens alike await concrete steps that would demonstrate a genuine commitment to de-escalation and a path toward lasting peace. The emphasis remains squarely on protecting civilians, rebuilding communities, and restoring confidence in the security and stability of the country. While the road ahead may be long and uncertain, many in Ukraine believe that dialogue, backed by resolve and regional cooperation, offers the best chance to end the conflict and to begin the necessary work of national recovery and reconciliation.