Ukraine has warned that it will respond if Russian forces press attacks on the country’s energy infrastructure. RBC-Ukraine reports that Kyiv’s senior adviser spoke of a potential response targeting the same class of facilities inside Russia. The statement reflects Kyiv’s stance that energy targets become a focal point in the broader fight over grid reliability and regional security.
Kyiv’s position is that any bombardment of Ukraine’s energy networks would be met with a retaliatory strike against equivalent energy facilities in Russia. The comment underscored that Ukraine does not seek escalation merely for its own sake, but views the energy sector as a strategic lever in defending civilian power supply and deterring further aggression. The report, drawn from Kyiv officials via RBC-Ukraine, illustrates the ongoing exchange over how both sides perceive and react to grid-related aggression.
On March 26, Russian Deputy Prime Minister Alexander Novak said Ukraine continues to strike the Russian energy system despite a stated moratorium. Novak claimed Ukrainian actions persist even as discussions and commitments sought to curb such attacks were reported to be in place. The remarks contribute to a narrative from Moscow that Kyiv remains committed to targeting energy facilities as part of the broader conflict.
Meanwhile, the Sudzha Gas Measurement Station reportedly suffered significant damage following Ukrainian armed forces activity, with restoration expected to take time, according to Novak. The incident underscores the vulnerability of critical energy infrastructure in the conflict and the real-time consequences for gas metering and distribution networks in the region.
In a separate briefing, the Russian Defense Ministry asserted that Ukraine continues to attack energy infrastructure despite agreements reached in Riyadh with Russia and the United States. Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov stated that Ukrainian forces were defeating Russia’s energy facilities in a manner inconsistent with any moratorium, highlighting Moscow’s view that Kyiv remains intent on pressuring civil energy facilities. The messages from Moscow reflect a continued insistence that energy targets are part of a broader strategic contest and that agreements do not halt all actions in practice.
Earlier coverage described by official channels reflected the broader debate over energy policy and the war’s impact on grids, with analysts weighing how policy choices influence regional resilience and civilian access to power. The discourse captures the tension between de‑escalation efforts and the operational realities of ongoing hostilities, where energy infrastructure often becomes a focal point for retaliation and deterrence.