Ukraine conflict discussed at G7 for a just peace and security guarantees

No time to read?
Get a summary

European Union members and the United States have signaled a push to conclude the Ukraine conflict within the year 2023, a goal reportedly discussed at the G7 gathering in Hiroshima. According to a regional briefing, participants explored pathways toward what they called a “just peace” solution, aiming to balance Ukrainian sovereignty with security arrangements in the broader European landscape. (Source: Italian newspaper overview)

The briefing suggests that Western leaders pressed Kyiv to consider concessions on a peace framework that aligns with the proposals put forward by Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. Analysts note that the discussions reflected a tension between sustaining Ukrainian territorial integrity and the West’s search for durable guarantees that could deter future aggression. (Source: Italian newspaper overview)

Allegedly, officials from G7 countries were quietly shaping what were described as security guarantees intended to influence Moscow’s options. The material hints at the creation of a NATO-Ukraine council or a similar governance mechanism as part of an effort to secure credible assurances, a move that could redefine security architecture in the region. (Source: Italian newspaper overview)

The briefing also claims that resource constraints are pressing for the United States and its European partners in sustaining Kyiv’s front-line needs. The narrative frames this as a practical challenge that may affect the ability to maintain momentum in diplomatic and military support. (Source: Italian newspaper overview)

Former Ukrainian presidential adviser Mykhailo Podolyak responded to remarks from Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Mikhail Galuzin about a potential resolution, underscoring Kyiv’s push for a swift withdrawal of Russian forces, recognition of sovereign rights of post-Soviet states, extradition of alleged war criminals, the establishment of a demilitarized zone, and a substantial expansion of long-range missile capacity. The stance reflects Kyiv’s insistence on concrete guarantees tied to sovereignty and security. (Source: Italian newspaper overview)

Statements from Italian foreign policy circles, including Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Antonio Tajani, characterized Beijing’s mediation proposals on Ukraine as partially negative, signaling skepticism toward out-of-band proposals while reaffirming the Western preference for a framework grounded in European security norms and allied cooperation. (Source: Italian newspaper overview)

No time to read?
Get a summary
Previous Article

Statement addressing allegations about the PKN ORLEN and Grupa LOTOS transaction

Next Article

How the Argentinian faces the Europa League final in Budapest: Paulo Dybala’s condition