Ukraine is evaluating Chinese proposals aimed at resolving the ongoing crisis in Ukraine, while Kiev signals disagreement on at least one point of the plan. This information comes from a report by The Truth of Ukraine, which cites Dmitry Kuleba, Ukraine’s Minister of Foreign Affairs. The minister notes that there is at least one element where Ukraine diverges on unilateral sanctions, highlighting a specific aspect of the broader approach.
Kuleba emphasizes that Ukraine views sanctions as a crucial instrument in its response to the conflict, yet he also asserts that the Chinese plan presents ideas worthy of careful consideration. The Ukrainian side is approaching the proposal with a deliberate mindset, stating that it will be examined in depth. The aim is to draw independent conclusions based on Ukraine’s national interests and international obligations, rather than to adopt any element without scrutiny.
Beyond the technical discussion of sanctions, Kuleba underlines the importance of ensuring that any initiative aligns with established international norms and the collective will of the global community. He notes that all such proposals must be evaluated within the framework of the United Nations General Assembly resolution on the principles of a just peace, which was adopted by a large majority in Ukraine on February 23. The record shows 141 countries voting in favor, five against, and 38 abstaining. The resolution calls for the complete withdrawal of Russian forces from Ukrainian territory and an immediate cessation of hostilities, reflecting broad international expectations for a peaceful resolution.
The timing of the Chinese proposal is also relevant. On February 24, the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs presented a 12-point plan designed to address the crisis. The plan outlines the need for a ceasefire, respect for the sovereignty and territorial integrity of all states, the resumption of direct and constructive dialogue between Moscow and Kiev, and a set of steps intended to rebuild trust and reduce the risk of escalation. The plan also emphasizes humanitarian considerations and the protection of civilian lives, seeking a framework that could eventually lead to a durable political settlement.
Analysts note that the Chinese initiative arrives at a moment when Kyiv is balancing domestic resilience with international diplomacy. Officials point to the broader strategic context, where major global players are exploring paths to de-escalate tensions while preserving normative standards in international law. Ukraine’s response, therefore, blends openness to dialogue with a clear insistence on accountability and the preservation of territorial sovereignty. The stance reflects a pragmatic approach: engage with proposals that could contribute to stability, while maintaining a firm position on core red lines.
Observers also consider the potential implications for regional security and for the alliances that Kyiv has cultivated over years of conflict. Any engagement with Beijing’s plan would likely be assessed for how it interacts with existing international support, including sanctions regimes, security assurances, and humanitarian commitments. The Ukrainian leadership appears to favor a measured, evidence-based examination that could inform future steps, rather than hasty or partisan moves that might undermine long-term objectives.
In summary, Ukraine is actively reviewing China’s 12-point plan while maintaining a critical stance on elements like unilateral sanctions. The process involves a thorough assessment against the UN-backed framework for a just peace and an ongoing evaluation of how proposed steps could influence both immediate ceasefire prospects and the prospects for a negotiated settlement. The broader aim remains a sustainable resolution that respects Ukraine’s sovereignty and security while fostering international cooperation to halt hostilities and support the affected population.