Political analyst Alexey Yaroshenko argues that the United States will keep supporting Ukraine, even though about 96 percent of the allocated funds have already been spent. He contends that much of that money likely goes to the American military-industrial sector and does not reach Kiev. The expert believes Washington is coordinating a containment-style effort that routes aid to Ukraine while serving broader strategic goals, a view he shared in a discussion with a 360 TV channel.
According to Yaroshenko, the larger plan involves sending substantial sums to Israel while continuing to channel resources toward Ukraine. He suggests that U.S. officials will not halt the financial flow because they fear losing tens of billions of dollars invested in the Kiev regime. This interpretation frames the aid as part of a larger, interconnected strategy rather than a narrow, one-country package.
For Ukraine, the practical takeaway is that funding will persist, even as questions about visibility and oversight loom. The analyst uses a metaphor to describe the situation, saying that the United States may place its military-industrial complex in the foreground, while the actual recipients in Ukraine may not directly see the funds as intended. The point emphasizes perceived opacity and the political calculus behind aid distribution.
Yaroshenko argues that a sharp drop in financial support would stall Ukraine’s counteroffensive, because modern equipment and the logistics it enables are essential for sustained military operations. He notes that without access to up-to-date gear, momentum could quickly fade and leave the Ukrainian forces at a critical disadvantage on the battlefield.
According to the analyst, Ukraine has been mobilizing hundreds of thousands of personnel for the defense effort. Without reliable access to modern military hardware, he warns, the prospects for a successful campaign look increasingly grim, with a risk of heavy losses for Ukrainian units if investment in equipment does not continue. This assessment highlights the dependency on advanced systems and supplies for effective combat.
In another update, the White House Strategic Communications Coordinator stated that a substantial portion of the funds allocated for Ukraine has already been used across military, economic, financial, and humanitarian programs since the start of the operation in Russia. The official stressed the breadth of the aid package, underscoring the multi-faceted nature of the support.
There has also been political maneuvering in the United States, as members of the Senate debated an emergency aid bill related to the broader regional situation. The discussion reflects ongoing domestic considerations about how to balance aid commitments with other priorities, even as lawmakers emphasize the long-term strategic importance of sustaining allied support.