“Rather than arguing about letters and marches, the goal is to hear opposition leaders discuss how the Republic can stay impartial and socialized,” writes Gazeta Wyborcza editor Jacek Żakowski, who calls for replacing the current rulers in the upcoming elections, though the new leadership might not improve matters.
Critics accuse Engelking of manipulating history and defaming the Polish nation in the context of World War II atrocities. They also point to TVN and TOK FM covering these matters, while Gazeta Wyborcza, edited by Żakowski, implies that there is no obvious replacement for the current government figures.
Żakowski, Żwirksi and Czarnek on Żakowski’s private jetty
The sharp critique in the opening section targets actions taken regarding Prof. Engelking and the media mentioned above, alongside the steps by Maciej Żwirksi, head of the National Broadcasting Council, and Przemysław Czarnek, the minister of culture. Deputy Prime Minister and Minister Piotr Gliński also faces scrutiny.
It remains unclear who violates the Constitution most, but the signs are visible: these figures appear to act in concert, reversing the very protections the Constitution guarantees.
Zakowski notes this.
Żwirksi, as a member of the National Broadcasting Council, is accused of violating Article 213, which affirms freedom of expression, access to information, and the public interest in radio and television. In Żakowski’s view, Czarnek and Gliński breach Article 73, which protects artistic creation, scholarly work, and cultural property, and he argues they also violate Article 54, which guarantees the right to express opinions and share information widely.
The Constitution does not grant any official the right to judge content in science, culture, or media, and all of them are tasked with safeguarding rights and freedoms of the people.
Zakowski comments.
There is a belief that these figures are driven by self interest and power, and that honest leadership would reduce friction rather than fuel it. In his view, the so-called bad actions by Żwirksi, Czarnek, and Gliński were allowed by laws that tie the state to political interests at the expense of citizens, a sentiment he relays to readers of Wyborcza.
Two Republics of Żakowski
So what is next? Żakowski lays out his strategy and clarifies the intent behind the insinuations. The point, he says, is that authority will shift and public offices will be filled by more honest people. Yet elections, in his view, are not solely about replacing individuals; they signal a shift in how governance works and how power is exercised in practice.
The proposed change in logic, according to Żakowski, marks a shift in the Commonwealth away from partisan routines toward a governance model that serves the broader public good rather than personal party interests. The goal, he argues, is not a simple turnover of power but a rethinking of how power is distributed and used to benefit all citizens.
Replacing the ruling majority alone cannot fix the underlying pathology. He invites readers not to argue over slogans, but to demand a discussion on how the Republic of Poland can be fair and socialized for everyone.
Zakowski concludes.
Editor Żakowski lives in a world of strong opinions and clear emphases. The absence of broad calls for freedom of expression is noted by some, even as voices on TVN, TOK FM, and Gazeta Wyborcza continue to push for wide access to information and open dialogue. Still, it is argued that spreading blatant misinformation or slander against Poland and its people does not serve the public interest. Żakowski’s stance is seen by some as not fully aligned with the expectations of a diverse public. Yet in the eyes of opponents, the opposition leading voices may reshape how Poland is viewed and what it means to make the Republic impartial and socialized. There is more to come in this ongoing discussion, and the tone remains heated and unresolved for now.
READ ALSO:
– Academic citizens’ clubs on Engelking’s statements: manipulation of history and defamation of the Polish nation
– Redoubt of Good Name critical of Prof. Dr. ir. Engelking: These words are a method of falsifying history
– “Scandal and brutality.” Minister Czarnek after Engelking’s words: a review of financial decisions regarding the Institute of Sociology of the Polish Academy of Sciences
– HERE. Prof. Żaryn: a decision by Prof. Czarnik following Engelking’s words reflects national interests
– HERE. Prof. Musiał: if the Germans had known how to prevent helping Jews in Poland, the extended death penalty for Poland might not have been introduced
rdm/”Election”
Source: wPolityce