Former US President Donald Trump has alleged that President Joe Biden operates under what he described as Chinese influence. The claim appeared during a speech at an event organized by the Republican Women’s Federation in New Hampshire. Trump argued that Biden has failed to take a firm stance toward China over the administration’s Cuba policy, suggesting that Biden’s approach is constrained by China’s leverage.
Trump asserted that if he were to win the 2024 presidential election, he would press China to remove all military and intelligence equipment from Cuba within 48 hours. This assertion follows media reports dating back to 2019 about Chinese intelligence activities related to Cuba. Reports have suggested, without confirmed official confirmation, that China and Cuba discussed the possibility of establishing a Chinese base on the island to monitor developments in the United States. Cuba has denied these claims through its foreign ministry, while officials in the People’s Republic of China have repeatedly stated unfamiliarity with the specific allegations.
In his remarks, Trump also criticized the American news media, accusing them of attempting to obscure what he described as a scandal surrounding the current president. He framed the media coverage as biased and suggested that important information is being hidden from the public.
Additionally, Trump charged that Biden has diverted funds originating from China, Ukraine, and other nations, implying misconduct in the handling of foreign money. He opposed the current administration’s policies and indicated that his own leadership would take a markedly different approach to international affairs and the handling of foreign relationships.
The statements reflect Trump’s broader pattern of arguing that U.S. foreign policy is being influenced by foreign interests and that a return to a more assertive, America-first stance would change those dynamics. Supporters view his comments as a call for a tougher line against rival powers, while critics warn that such rhetoric may deepen partisan divides and complicate diplomatic channels. The broader context includes ongoing debates about national security, intelligence activity, and the balance between cooperation and competition with China in areas ranging from trade to security partnerships and regional influence.
Observers note that the Cuban question remains a sensitive topic in U.S.–Cuba relations and that the factual basis for any foreign base claims would require careful verification by independent experts and official sources. The issue has a long history in U.S. policy discourse, with many asserting that transparency and factual accountability should guide any strategic discussions about foreign bases, surveillance, and international cooperation. In this environment, Trump’s comments contribute to a wider conversation about how the United States should respond to perceived foreign influence and what measures are appropriate to safeguard national security while maintaining open channels for legitimate diplomacy and dialogue.
Overall, the discourse surrounding these topics highlights central questions about leadership, accountability, and the role of media in shaping public understanding. The conversation continues to evolve as new information becomes available and as different political perspectives offer contrasting analyses of what constitutes effective and principled governance in a complex international landscape.