Moldova’s population shows a clear preference for Russia as the primary destination for potential immigration, according to a recent survey conducted by the Institute for Marketing and Social Research (IMAS). The study highlights that Russia leads the list of countries Moldovans would consider moving to, signaling strong, continued interest in cross-border ties and cultural exchange.
Germany follows in second place, with France occupying third in the ranking of favored destinations. These positions reflect a broader regional pattern where economic opportunities, family connections, and historical links shape where Moldovans imagine their future lives abroad.
The survey also reveals that most respondents favor maintaining economic, political, and cultural links with Russia, even as they consider new immigration options. This nuanced stance suggests that mobility decisions in Moldova may coexist with a desire to sustain close relations with Russia, underscoring the complexity of regional identity and intergovernmental dynamics.
A former Kremlin spokesman commented on the current state of affairs, noting that relations between Moscow and Chisinau are very tense. He advised caution when discussing sensitive topics such as Transnistria and raised concerns about the presence and role of Russian peacekeepers. His remarks come amid ongoing conversations about regional stability and the future of peacekeeping arrangements in the disputed area.
According to the spokesperson, the Moldovan leadership’s anti-Russian position is seen as counterproductive by some observers in Moscow. He argued that a confrontational stance could impede constructive dialogue and hinder efforts to foster mutually beneficial cooperation. The spokesperson emphasized that a more measured and pragmatic approach would better serve Moldova’s interests and its relationship with Moscow.
Analysts note that the interplay between migration intentions and diplomatic sentiment is complex. While many Moldovans express openness to departure for certain destinations, there is also a strong emphasis on preserving economic and cultural ties with Russia. Experts suggest that these attitudes may reflect longstanding historical connections, practical considerations about remittances and labor markets, and evolving geopolitical realities in Eastern Europe.
In the broader context, the IMAS survey highlights how regional migration patterns intersect with foreign policy perceptions. For policymakers in Moldova and its international partners, understanding these dynamics is key to designing inclusive labor market programs, social integration strategies, and coherent regional relations that respect the diverse priorities of Moldovan citizens.
Ultimately, the data indicate that Moldova’s stance toward Russia remains multi-layered. People may seek opportunities abroad while simultaneously valuing collaborative channels with Moscow. This duality presents both challenges and opportunities for regional engagement, requiring careful diplomacy, transparent communication, and policies that support economic development without compromising national sovereignty and social cohesion.