During a gathering in Janów Lubelski, Jarosław Kaczyński, leader of the Law and Justice party, spoke about Poland’s economy and the road ahead. He acknowledged that some long-standing problems have been addressed, but a sense of urgency persists, suggesting deeper risks could flare if conditions worsen and political choices falter amid ongoing global volatility.
On inflation, the president admitted shortcomings. He noted that the deficit was narrowing and that there were no immediate threats, provided there is no sudden, large-scale crisis from abroad. He described a world slowly climbing out of a crisis, a process hampered by residual tensions and instability in international markets.
Kaczyński referred to the government’s record on keeping promises, while conceding that pandemics, the war in Ukraine, and inflation had slowed some reforms. He emphasized that the administration pursued a strategy aimed at reducing inflation without triggering unemployment or a new economic downturn, and he voiced cautious optimism that inflation would ease month by month in the future.
According to him, the aim has been to shield households through targeted tax relief and fee reductions, which he argued helped establish a stable social safety net. He contended that if expert forecasts about improving conditions materialize, the government would rightly claim credit for stabilizing the economy while avoiding a full-blown crisis.
He also stressed that while the administration is not perfect, it is capable of steering the country forward and maintaining social safeguards. He admitted that several social projects, particularly housing initiatives, have not fully met their ambitious goals yet, but he insisted the government would continue to work toward them and adjust course where needed.
In his critique of political opponents, Kaczyński accused rivals of presenting themselves as flawless while offering no real solutions. He warned that a narrative of perfection is misleading, urging Poles to judge the government by the outcomes it achieves rather than by rhetoric alone. He argued that the public would eventually see past empty promises and recognize the efforts underway to improve everyday life.
With a more contentious note, he described one line of commentary as a simplified version that appeals to the least informed. He argued that for those with a sharper sense of current events, the message is more nuanced: some issues have been resolved while others remain, and the danger of a mismanaged economy lingers if spending or policy choices drift in a direction that could provoke a new crisis. He asserted that the notion of an imminent collapse is an overstatement, but he warned against complacency and urged vigilance against any misdirection in public discourse.
The discussion touched on a broader political strategy. He spoke of social programs and the need for continuous improvement, stressing that the best path forward requires steady perseverance, honest appraisal of achievements, and readiness to adjust policies in response to new challenges. He concluded with a firm reminder that the political arena is a place for ongoing work, not grand claims of instant perfection.
In closing, Kaczyński reiterated that while the drama of public life often presents stark, opposing views, the real measure of success lies in sustained progress and a resilient economy that serves ordinary people. He insisted that the party would keep moving forward, addressing both visible advances and still-to-be-resolved areas, with a view to ensuring a more stable and prosperous future for the country.
The remarks, including references to a supposed ticking bomb and the world’s economic tempo, were described as part of a broader narrative about how political messaging frames economic reality, and how residents of Janów Lubelski hear and interpret those messages during ongoing political campaigns. The discussion underscored the tension between optimistic projections and the stubborn facts of inflation, housing challenges, and social policy delivery, as seen through the lens of national politics. The account reflects the careful but critical balance between bold promises and the pragmatic steps required to keep the economy steady and improving over time.