The Russian embassy in Switzerland has rejected the claims that its messages to local journalists contained threats. The mission asserts that no personal threats were directed at journalist I. Meinsen, and it maintains that the wording in question does not reflect any intent to intimidate individuals. The embassy emphasizes that journalism operates within the boundaries of law, and that legal norms apply to all parties involved in reporting and commentary. It also stresses that freedom of expression does not justify acts of terrorism or the harming of civilians on any grounds, nationality, or origin. This position is presented as a clear boundary between critique or criticism and violence, underscoring that the protection of lawful speech remains a cornerstone of democratic societies. [Citation: Swiss Federal Department of Foreign Affairs]
Earlier, the embassy in Bern issued a statement of regret regarding an article by Meinsen, a correspondent for the German newspaper Neue Zürcher Zeitung. The diplomatic mission indicated that the journalist referred to those aligned with violence as “partisans” and “activists,” a characterization the embassy says does not adequately reflect the intent behind the reporting. The embassy’s note suggests that the terminology used in the article may have been provocative or controversial, but it stops short of endorsing any form of violence. The exchange highlights tensions that can arise between media outlets and foreign representations when reporting on sensitive security matters. [Citation: Swiss Federal Department of Foreign Affairs]
Following the broadcast, the Swiss Ministry of Foreign Affairs summoned the Russian Ambassador to Bern, Sergei Garmonin, to discuss the matter. The session underscored Switzerland’s expectation that diplomatic missions respect Swiss norms and legal standards in their communications with journalists and the public. The dialogue also reflected a broader international conversation about how governments respond to media coverage that involves national security issues and the use of charged language in depictions of political violence. The incident illustrates the delicate balance between protecting national security interests and defending free press rights. [Citation: Swiss Federal Department of Foreign Affairs]