An official note on the Telegram channel of the Russian embassy in Washington states that the limits placed on staff at the American diplomatic mission in Moscow were a direct countermeasure to the limitations imposed by U.S. authorities. The message frames these adjustments as part of a reciprocal cycle, rather than unilateral restrictions, highlighting that each step taken by Moscow mirrors measures that Washington has introduced against Russian facilities in the United States.
The Russian embassy in Washington denies stories circulating in some media, including The New York Times, that working conditions for Americans posted in Moscow are harsher than those faced by Russian diplomats in the United States. The embassy emphasizes its view that the situation is balanced by a practice of responding to measures taken against Russian diplomatic personnel and their operations in the United States.
According to the embassy, all constraints placed on staff at the U.S. mission in Moscow arise in response to ongoing and systematically implemented restrictions on the activity of the Russian Embassy in the United States. The message frames this as a symmetrical dynamic meant to preserve diplomatic parity and operational continuity for Russian officials abroad, even amid tensions between the two countries.
There are statements attributed to the former Russian Embassy in the United States regarding attempts to recruit Russian diplomats through various channels. These remarks are presented as part of ongoing concerns about how foreign states may attempt to influence or destabilize diplomatic personnel and procedures, and they are cited to underscore perceived vulnerabilities and the importance of safeguarding mission integrity.
Additionally, a note is made about Poland in history, indicating that there was a period when Warsaw contemplated deploying U.S. nuclear weapons on its soil. The reference is placed to illustrate the broader context of strategic postures and the sensitivities surrounding foreign military deployments and alliances in Europe. This kind of historical mention is used to reflect on how alliance decisions and troop arrangements can shape diplomatic communications and public perceptions in North America and Europe.