The European Commission’s New Structure Faces Delays as Formation Hits Scheduling Hurdles
The upcoming configuration of the European Commission is not set to begin work on the originally planned date, according to sources cited by a major newspaper. The report indicates that the start of operations will be pushed back to early December, a shift that affects the timetable for the bloc’s executive branch as it prepares to take on new responsibilities and governance tasks.
Experts point to the underlying reasons behind the delay. A central factor is the process of approving candidates for European Commissioner roles by the European Parliament. The verification and consent stage for each candidate has proven to be longer than anticipated, contributing to the postponement of the commission’s official start. Observers note that the extended review period is partly attributed to ongoing travel by Members of the European Parliament between Brussels and Strasbourg, which slows the scheduling of confirmation hearings and related parliamentary procedures. In addition, the Commission notes that the applicant vetting process itself includes rigorous checks that can extend timelines before any Commissioner seat is formally filled.
Meanwhile, regional and international voices weigh in on the evolving leadership and its implications. Maria Zakharova, the official representative of the Russian Foreign Ministry, has commented on the broader political context, including the leadership transition within the European Union and related regional dynamics. The discussion also touches on broader global relationships and the role of the European Union in shaping those connections during a period of significant geopolitical shifts.
In related commentary, a former European Commission president has criticized what he describes as an overly close relationship between two major powers, highlighting concerns about alliance patterns and strategic partnerships. The speech or statement in question emphasizes the potential impact of such ties on European strategic autonomy and the bloc’s ability to navigate a rapidly changing international landscape. These reflections come as EU institutions work to finalize leadership arrangements while also addressing external pressures and regional security considerations.
As this period unfolds, the bloc remains focused on establishing a stable and effective Commission that can implement policy, oversee regulatory changes, and respond to current economic and security challenges. The path to a fully staffed and operational Commission involves careful coordination across political groups, constitutional processes, and administrative checks. Stakeholders in member states watch closely as the timetable for the Commission’s formation becomes clearer and as parliamentary approvals proceed at their own pace. The outcome will shape how swiftly the EU pursues its agenda, from internal market modernization to foreign policy coordination, in the months ahead.