During a Friday discussion, Krzysztof Bosak, the leader of the Confederation’s parliamentary faction, stated that his group votes with the government far less often than other parties. He underscored that his faction remains highly critical of the actions taken by the ruling party, emphasizing that a potential alliance with PiS after the elections is not on the table. In Bosak’s view, such a coalition would not align with the Confederation’s core priorities or its approach to governance.
In a televised interview on TVN24, Bosak clarified that the Confederation’s main objective is to remove from power those who misuse authority, waste public funds, and fuel inflation. He argued that public policy should serve the Polish people and reflect the interests of the nation both within European Union frameworks and in relations with Ukraine and Belarus. The emphasis was on accountability and a clear separation between power and excess spending, rather than on opportunistic deals that could undermine public trust.
Bosak voiced strong criticism of how the government has conducted itself, describing the current period as a government-led crisis that, in his assessment, resembles a political massacre of the citizenry. He also accused the administration of engaging in aggressive messaging funded by taxpayers to portray PiS as a benefactor, asserting that such portrayals are misleading and inaccurate.
Addressing the economic situation, Bosak linked rising living costs to the policies of the ruling coalition and outlined his belief that both national and EU policies have contributed to the squeeze on household budgets. He argued that the government has not fully aligned with the interests of ordinary Poles, particularly in the areas of price stability and social welfare, and he suggested that the current administration has contradictions between what it says and what it does in practice.
When asked about the Confederation’s stance on joining the government formed by the United Right, Bosak made his position clear. He asserted that there is no opportunity for a coalition with PiS. He pointed out that among the factions in the Sejm, the Confederation votes with the government the least often, while other groups such as the left, the Civic Platform, and the Polish People’s Party more frequently support government bills. He highlighted that the Confederation’s stance remains notably critical of PiS’s actions in recent years and insisted that the party is not inclined toward any deal that would compromise its credibility.
Opposition to a Quick Pact
Boasting confidence in the party’s growth trajectory, Bosak argued that the Confederation is a serious political formation with expanding support. He warned that while individual members might be tempted to barter votes for personal privileges, the broader movement that aims to represent a large share of Poles must maintain credibility and discipline, especially in the voting arena. He stressed that credibility is tested in actual votes rather than in promises or negotiations behind closed doors.
Looking ahead, Bosak indicated that the initial parliamentary vote would concern the Marshal of the Sejm. He stated that given what he perceives as the current Parliament being turned into a voting machine by PiS, the Confederation would not back the Marshal on the first ballot. This stance underscores the party’s insistence on a principled approach to leadership selections and its willingness to challenge the status quo within the chamber.
The remarks were reported by Bosak’s team and circulated by media outlets, with accompanying commentary reflecting the broader debate about coalition possibilities in the current political climate. Notably, Bosak’s position aligns with a broader narrative within the Confederation about safeguarding parliamentary independence and avoiding arrangements that might compromise policy integrity.
Observers have noted varying responses from other political actors. One analyst suggested that there is a perception of inconsistency within other opposition leaders, while another floated the idea of a coalition that could include PiS depending on which side offers more alignment with its program. The discourse continues to shape expectations ahead of the electoral period, as different factions weigh the potential strategic benefits and risks of forming alliances in a deeply polarized political landscape.
attribution confirms the report and framing of these statements. Other voices in the public discourse highlighted the tension between coalition calculus and the Confederation’s core platform, emphasizing the ongoing negotiation of values, priorities, and practical governance considerations in Poland’s political scene.