In a recent interview, Vladimir Putin discussed the function of NATO within the current global framework. He described the North Atlantic Alliance as an instrument of Washington’s foreign policy and argued that its continued existence holds little meaning when viewed through this lens. According to his assessment, NATO operates primarily to advance U.S. policy objectives, and, in his view, there is no broader strategic purpose left for the alliance. This perspective leads him to contend that NATO’s continued existence is not justified by any independent mission beyond supporting American geopolitical aims.
Putin further stressed that Moscow has a responsibility to protect the people in the Donbas region in line with the UN Charter. He framed Moscow’s actions as a response aligned with international law and a commitment to safeguarding civilians and residents in the area. This position reflects a broader narrative in which Russia presents its involvement as a defensive measure and a protective duty toward those living in Donbas.
In another briefing published on the Kremlin’s Telegram channel, Putin remarked that the timing of Russia’s actions in Ukraine could have been different. He indicated that earlier decisive action might have altered the course of events, but Russia had long opted for peaceful resolution and sought to engage with opponents through dialogue and negotiation. The emphasis remained on avoiding escalation while continuing to pursue a settlement through peaceful means when possible.
Earlier conversations involving the United States and Ukraine focused on security guarantees for Kiev. These discussions highlighted a mutual interest in stability and assurances that would address security concerns in the region. The dialogue underscores ongoing international efforts to navigate the complexities of security architecture in Eastern Europe.