The latest statements from official channels in Washington and Moscow center on Russia’s decision to suspend participation in the Treaty on Measures for the Further Reduction and Limitation of Strategic Offensive Arms, commonly known as START or START-3. Washington has publicly described this move as legally inconsistent with the treaty’s framework, arguing that Russia remains bound by the agreement’s terms. The official position asserts that Russia cannot simply walk away from the commitments it accepted when the treaty was in force, and that all parties should adhere to the legality of the instrument rather than suspend its obligations outright. This summary of views is drawn from remarks issued by the United States Department of State and related government communications. (U.S. Department of State)
In a separate articulation, a spokesperson emphasized that the suspension does not erase Russia’s legal duties under START. The message conveyed is that Russia remains a participant with responsibilities under the treaty and that the United States continues to expect compliance with the agreed provisions. The emphasis is on upholding the treaty’s governance framework, including verification and transparency measures that have historically underpinned the agreement. (U.S. Department of State)
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Russia has also outlined its stance, stating that the United States and other signatories should proceed with inspections and dialogue under the treaty. The ministry indicated that Russian inspectors hold the required visas and that no sanctions should impede Russia from exercising its rights to participate in inspections under START. The statement underscores a preference for continued openness, dialogue, and mutual verification as core mechanisms to address areas of concern. (Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation)
Meanwhile, comments from Russia’s ambassador to the United Kingdom, Andrey Kelin, suggest that Moscow could consider rejoining START if Washington signals a readiness to abandon attempts to outpace Russia strategically. The ambassador framed the issue as a strategic balance where both sides engage constructively rather than pursuing overt advantages. The context highlights the broader dynamics shaping arms control discussions between Moscow and Washington, including the prerequisites for restored participation and confidence-building steps. (Ambassador Andrey Kelin; Russian Foreign Ministry)
On February 28, the President of Russia signed into law the suspension of the country’s participation in START. The designation of this legal act follows a series of formal steps within the Russian government and reflects the current posture in Moscow regarding the treaty. The development arrives amid ongoing international dialogue about the future of strategic stability and the role of verification regimes in limiting strategic weapons. (Russian Presidential Administration; Official Russian Federal Register)