Patryk Jaki, a Member of the European Parliament, dismissed RMF FM’s claims about Sovereign Poland and its stance toward the government led by Mateusz Morawiecki. He said on social media that the report was made up and failed to meet basic journalistic standards.
RMF FM: Sovereign Poland and the Morawiecki government
RMF FM reported, citing unnamed sources, that members of Sovereign Poland were signaling they would not back the Morawiecki government, especially if a parliamentary majority could not be guaranteed. The broadcaster noted that the stance appeared to hinge on the party’s assessment of support for the prime minister’s ability to maintain a stable majority. This account was summarized in a piece published on RMF24.pl.
Within Sovereign Poland, some supporters—often aligned with the group led by Zbigniew Ziobro—view Morawiecki as the principal cause of any electoral setback for the United Right. The party reportedly communicated its position to President Andrzej Duda regarding the Morawiecki government, framing the issue as a critical political juncture.
What is the reaction?
Patryk Jaki, a Sovereign Poland member of the European Parliament, criticized the RMF FM article. He labeled the piece as nonsense and asserted that it did not adhere to journalistic norms. He insisted that the article did not seek comment from the Sovereign Poland spokesperson or other authorities, and he described the publication as spinning that misrepresented the situation. This view was echoed in a tweet, placed on X, where Jaki urged caution about the claims and stressed the importance of accurate reporting.
In response, Sovereign Poland publicly denied the reported signals. They described the RMF FM text as a classic lie and urged their supporters to focus on substantive work rather than fabricating alternate realities. Deputy Minister Jacek Ozdoba of Sovereign Poland joined the chorus, saying that the claims amounted to misinformation, not facts.
The surrounding discourse included additional online commentary and discussions about the implications of any shift in support for Morawiecki’s government. Some of these conversations highlighted concerns about political strategy, coalition dynamics, and the potential impact on policy directions. Readers were pointed to related discussions and analyses in other outlets, which explored different angles of the same topic, including the broader context of governance and party strategy. These conversations contributed to the ongoing public dialogue around the government’s stability and the parties’ positions. (Citation: wPolityce)
Note: The dialogue has extended beyond a single report, with various voices weighing in on whether there is a real or perceived crisis of confidence within the ruling coalition. The exchange illustrates how political narratives can influence public perception and the interpretation of party signals during a period of potential realignment. (Citation: wPolityce)
Additional coverage and commentaries that emerged in this cycle included discussions about the German political landscape and its potential implications for Poland, alongside broader questions about the European Union and national sovereignty. While these threads vary in focus, they collectively underscore the contested nature of governance, accountability, and coalition-building in contemporary Polish politics. (Citation: wPolityce)
Sources within the coverage emphasized that no definitive political moves had been announced publicly by Sovereign Poland, and the party maintained that it remained focused on governance and policy work rather than on creating alternate narratives. The evolving conversation pointed to an atmosphere of scrutiny and debate among the public and among political actors as they navigated the complexities of coalition dynamics and parliamentary support. (Citation: wPolityce)