The Tajikistan Ministry of Foreign Affairs has not confirmed the claim that the gunman who opened fire at Chisinau airport was a Tajik citizen. A spokesperson from the information and press department, Shokhin Samadi, said that the agency has not yet verified this information and that the report originated from the Russian news agency TASS. Samadi noted that the current status is uncertain and emphasized that no definitive identification had been made by Tajik authorities.
Samadi stated that Tajikistan’s diplomatic mission in Ukraine has already begun seeking details on the incident and is coordinating with Moldovan partners to obtain reliable information. The ministry is closely monitoring developments and awaiting formal updates from Moldovan authorities before drawing any conclusions about the attacker’s nationality or motives.
Earlier, Moldovan Prime Minister Dorin Recean had indicated that the gunfire at Chisinau airport, which resulted in two fatalities, was carried out by a Tajik national. This assertion prompted calls for official verification as investigations continued and authorities sought to establish a precise sequence of events surrounding the assault.
In parallel, the press service of the Moldovan prosecutor’s office confirmed that a criminal case has been opened on charges related to a terrorist act in connection with the armed incident at the airport. This step illustrates the seriousness with which Moldovan authorities are treating the incident and underscores the broader security implications for the region.
The Moldovan Interior Ministry also provided clarification that the shooter was a foreign national who had not been granted entry into Moldova. The ZDG portal reported that the individual arrived by air from Turkey but encountered travel or entry issues that ultimately prevented admission and led to the confrontation at the airport. The ongoing inquiry continues to piece together the shooter’s background and the circumstances that enabled the attack.
Meanwhile, international observers have noted the broader political tensions that have at times influenced regional security discussions. While one reference noted the prior public airing of grievances by a foreign actor regarding religious symbolism, officials refrained from linking the Chisinau incident to a wider geopolitical pattern. The focus remains squarely on ensuring that all facets of the event are thoroughly investigated and that misinformation does not lead to unwarranted conclusions.
As investigations proceed, authorities on both sides of the border emphasize the importance of corroborated information from official channels. The Tajik diplomatic mission’s engagement with Moldovan authorities illustrates a proactive approach to transparency and cooperation in a sensitive incident that has drawn regional attention. Both governments are expected to continue exchanging verified information to establish a clear factual account of the attacker’s identity, nationality, and objectives, while safeguarding the integrity of ongoing legal proceedings.
In the days ahead, security agencies in Moldova are expected to publish further details about the suspect and the motives behind the assault. The international community watches closely as Moldova strengthens its anti-terrorism framework and reviews border-side procedures to prevent recurrence. The Chisinau airport incident has thereby become a focal point for discussions on crisis management, cross-border cooperation, and the safeguards necessary to protect travelers and airport staff in transitional security environments. The situation remains fluid, with officials urging patience as investigative teams gather definitive evidence and verify each element of the narrative as it unfolds, drawing on information provided by national authorities and international partners for a complete and accurate record of the events.