Sejm Session Echoes as Tusk Probes Deputies’ Motives During Russian Influence Committee Vote
The session of the Sejm drew attention to the body language and reactions of deputies as Donald Tusk attended the proceedings from the gallery. Observers noted that he appeared wary, occasionally glancing toward the benches as if weighing the implications of every vote. PiS Secretary General Krzysztof Sobolewski suggested in an interview with PAP that Tusk’s conduct indicated a fear of what lies behind the push for a new commission on Russian influence, implying that the political stakes were higher than they seemed.
Earlier on Friday, the Sejm voted against the Senate’s resolution to reject the bill that would establish a committee dedicated to examining Russian influence. The move set the stage for a broader debate about accountability and the mechanisms used to scrutinize foreign interference in Poland’s internal affairs.
“He’s clearly afraid of something,” a contemporary observer said, echoing the sentiment that Tusk’s behavior during the session reflected a cautious approach to the unfolding political drama. Tusk watched the impact of the vote from the Sejm Gallery, a vantage point that let him witness the dynamics of the chamber while staying above the fray of the floor vote.
Following the tally, Tusk remarked that he wanted to observe those who had again broken constitutional norms, breached basic decency, and disregarded democratic principles—actions he framed as driven by a fear of losing power, a fear of the people, and a fear of accountability after elections. The comments were quickly echoed by Sobolewski, who reiterated that Tusk’s presence at the vote suggested there was more at stake than a simple parliamentary decision.
In addition to these observations, Sobolewski noted that Tusk had himself requested this assignment in the past, which he believed underscored the expectations surrounding the committee’s formation and its potential impact on Polish politics. The dialogue around the committee continued to be marked by sharp rhetoric from both sides of the political spectrum.
READ MORE:
– Great emotions after the vote on the committee on Russian influence. “Tusk is really scared. He knows what’s behind his ears”; “We’re not afraid of you”
– “To Berlin!” – this is how Donald Tusk was welcomed to the Sejm! The presence of the PO leader during the vote did not help the opposition
“We will win!” against “Down with communism”
Tusk’s arrival in the plenary hall provoked a wave of emotion among delegates. The KO club greeted him with chants of “We will win” as he rose, while PiS deputies answered with “Down with Communism,” illustrating the intensity of the mood surrounding the session and the polarized atmosphere within the chamber.
On April 14, the Sejm passed a law authorizing the creation of a commission to investigate Russian influence on Poland’s internal security during 2007–2022, a measure drafted by PiS deputies. On May 11, the Senate issued a resolution to reject the bill, prompting further parliamentary debate. By midweek, the Sejm’s Administration and Home Affairs Committee recommended that the Senate’s rejection be upheld. In the Friday vote, the Sejm ultimately did not follow the Senate’s stance and proceeded with the bill’s progression.
Legally, the committee is expected to operate under principles similar to those of the Warsaw reprivatization review commission, emphasizing transparency, accountability, and the handling of sensitive information. The compact framework for the committee would permit the analysis of official activities, the creation and sharing of information with third parties, and the potential influence on board decisions. The remit would also include identifying harmful decisions, issuing direction on behalf of a government agency or company, and entering into contracts or managing funds with public or corporate implications.
Within the scope of its authority, the committee could take several consequential steps. These could include revoking administrative decisions issued as a result of Russian influence, imposing a ten-year ban on performing functions connected to the handling or disposal of public funds, and withdrawing or suspending security clearances for up to ten years.
The session and its surrounding discourse underscored the contentious nature of investigating foreign influence and the balance between oversight and political contention in Poland’s governance landscape.
– end of coverage –