Seven PiS members of parliament faced a three-month restriction on their parliamentary allowances after a decision reached by the Presidium of the Sejm, following a request from the Sejm’s Speaker. The outcome, announced by Deputy Speaker Monika Wielichowska, came after a detailed review of footage and materials presented at the chamber’s meeting. The line of events that led to this penalty trace back to a tense moment when representatives from PiS clashed with members of the Marshal Guard during an apparent effort to bring two officials, Mariusz Kamiński and Maciej Wąsik, into the Sejm for a session. Wielichowska indicated that the decision still allows room for appeals, which could be filed with the Presidium for consideration in due course.
Marshal Hołownia signaled his intention to urge the Presidium to impose the strongest possible penalty on the seven PiS MPs involved, citing the disruption caused and the challenge to the authority and procedures of the Sejm. The list of punished MPs, as identified by the marshal, includes Małgorzata Gosiewska, Katarzyna Sójka, Edward Siarka, Jan Dziedziczak, Antoni Macierewicz, Jacek Bogucki, and Jerzy Polaczek. The Presidium met to assess the incident, and after reviewing the material, Wielichowska informed reporters that the disciplinary action had been confirmed.
According to the deputy speaker, the marshal guard commander’s footage was examined in slow motion with multiple camera angles. The review confirmed that seven MPs were involved, among them two women. She described visible actions such as jostling, grabbing by the hand, neck, and arm twisting, emphasizing that the sequence of events was clear on the recordings. The deputy speaker stressed that the punishment targeted all involved PiS MPs in the same manner, reflecting a uniform approach to the breach of parliamentary decorum that day.
The decision to deprive the seven MPs of their parliamentary allowances for a quarter of a year was presented as a measure aligned with the rules governing conduct in the Sejm and as a signal that disruptions of this kind would be met with concrete consequences. Wielichowska confirmed that the Presidium concurred with the penalty and noted that potential appeals are expected to be directed to the Presidium, which will be responsible for ruling on them. She also clarified that all punished MPs from the PiS group received identical treatment in this context.
Observers note that the incident occurred in a period of heightened political tension within the Sejm, with accusations and counter-accusations shaping the public narrative around procedural standards and the rights of MPs to participate in sessions. The actions by the marshal and his guards were framed by supporters and critics in ways that reflect broader partisan debates about security, authority, and the accessibility of parliamentary spaces during votes and deliberations. The episode has sparked renewed discussion about how the Sejm enforces rules during high-stakes moments and what constitutes acceptable behavior by members and security personnel alike.
The Sejm’s leadership has repeatedly stressed the need for orderly proceedings, especially when significant political figures and actions are under consideration. The recent disciplinary outcome was presented as part of a broader effort to uphold the integrity of parliamentary processes and ensure that all members are aware of the consequences of disruptive conduct. As the process moves forward, the pattern of appeals and subsequent reviews will be watched closely by lawmakers, analysts, and the public, who seek to understand how the discipline system functions in practice and how it might adapt to future incidents.
In the aftermath, there is interest in how this event will influence the behavior of MPs and security personnel in similar scenarios. The balance between enforcing rules and preserving the ability of MPs to carry out their duties during challenging sessions remains a focal point of discussion among political observers. The incident has also drawn attention to the dynamics within the PiS group and how party leadership responds to confrontations within the legislative process. The broader question for observers is how the Sejm will navigate the line between firm enforcement of rules and maintaining an environment conducive to debate and democratic participation.
The episode concludes with formal steps ahead, including possible appeals and the ongoing review of the procedures applied in the incident. The authorities emphasize that the aim is to preserve order within the chamber while ensuring that any decision process remains transparent and subject to appropriate checks and balances. The public, journalists, and international audiences will likely continue to follow the developments as more information becomes available and as the legal and procedural implications of the punishment unfold.