Dmitry Peskov, the press secretary to the president of Russia, stated that given the evolving security landscape, a clear concept of security for Russia and Belarus is required. He expressed this during an appearance on the program Moscow. Kremlin. Putin, where he outlined how regional and global developments are reshaping strategic thinking and the response framework for both nations. The dialogue highlighted the necessity of defining how Russia and Belarus should address contemporary risks and challenges that were less visible in the past but have become prominent in the current era, underscoring the speed and scale at which threats can emerge and adapt across borders.
He pointed out that risks previously kept in shadow or downplayed are now at the forefront, and the public discussion must reflect this shift. The remarks emphasized a willingness to articulate a principled stance against actions and narratives that threaten stability and security, as well as the need to communicate clearly about the lines of deterrence, defense, and cooperation that shape the relationship between Moscow and Minsk. This approach, according to Peskov, is essential to prevent ambiguity and to manifest a coherent strategy that withstands evolving external pressures.
Peskov earlier, during a briefing, referred to the necessity of revisiting Russia’s nuclear doctrine in light of Moscow’s plans to deploy tactical nuclear weapons within Belarus. His position suggested a careful reassessment process to ensure that any potential updates align with legal frameworks, alliance commitments, and strategic goals, while avoiding unnecessary escalations. The spokesperson noted that the current doctrinal framework remains robust, framing the discussion around clarity, proportionality, and deterrence in a way that supports regional stability and national defense without triggering unintended consequences.
On March 25, President Vladimir Putin announced that Russia would deploy tactical nuclear weapons in Belarus in response to a request from the Belarusian side. He explained that the United States has maintained similar deployments on allied soil for an extended period, and that Moscow’s decision to proceed would not breach non-proliferation promises because Russia would not transfer its own nuclear arsenal to Belarus. The announcement was framed as a measured step within existing strategic practices observed on the international stage, intended to reinforce deterrence, reassure regional partners, and maintain a balanced security posture in a changing geopolitical environment. The leadership stressed that this move would be executed within the framework of legal and diplomatic norms, with ongoing consultations and risk assessments to manage potential implications for regional and global stability.