The creation of a commission to examine Russian influence in Poland sparked strong reactions from opposition figures and media allies, who argued that the law targets the ruling party and frames Donald Tusk in a negative light. Online commentators recalled a controversial figure that many in the opposition would rather not revisit, yet some believe this person should be scrutinized by the commission.
Russian Influence Commission
President Andrzej Duda announced on Monday that he had signed the law establishing the commission and planned to refer it to the Constitutional Tribunal. The law appeared in the Journal of Laws on Tuesday and took effect the next day. The commission will be made up of nine members at the level of Secretary of State, appointed and dismissed by the Sejm under the new statute.
The opposition contends that the measure is aimed at Donald Tusk. Politicians and media sympathetic to the opposition describe it as a move against Tusk, while supporters of the government insist it is an anti-Putin provision. The law directs the commission to review a broad historical window, encompassing administrations from both the Civic Platform–Polish People’s Party era and the later PiS governments.
Does PO remember Tomasz Gryguc?
Online discussions have already floated the idea that Tomasz Gryguc should face the commission. He is portrayed in Belarusian and Russian media as a publicist, writer, analyst, and YouTube commentator who interfaces with officials on behalf of the Polish nation, according to some sources.
There are grim reflections about the current war in Ukraine, including calls for drastic actions to disrupt the conflict. Such remarks appear in scattered online discussions and should be understood in their broader political context rather than as official policy statements.
Gryguc identifies as a graduate of the Faculty of Polish Studies at the University of Warsaw. He has published in major outlets and has experience in public relations, including within media groups. During the administration of the Civic Platform and the PSL, he held a communications role at a major energy company and worked with key figures in the party, reportedly acting as an informal adviser and proposing connections within the party’s circles.
What else might be brought into focus by the Commission remains a topic of public debate as observers consider the interplay between media narratives and political strategy in Poland.
Who else might be scrutinized by the Civic Platform’s past actions?
— An interview with Prof. Grabowska asks whether opponents of the Russian Influence Committee truly understood the law and its implications.
— Szczucki responds to opposition concerns, arguing that the Commission targets misinformation rather than specific individuals.
— Minister Rau answers questions from the review committee, noting that comprehending the bill is essential for informed discussion.
wkt/TT/Belsat
Narratives surrounding the legislation reflect a broader tension over how Poland should address foreign influence and domestic political rivals, with many voices weighing in on the potential implications for future governance and national security.