Russia is considering a new penalty for walking dogs deemed potentially dangerous in public spaces. The proposed measure would impose a fine ranging from one thousand to three thousand rubles on people who allow such dogs to roam without a muzzle and a leash. This development has been reported by a major newspaper outlet in Russia, highlighting the ongoing debate over pet safety and public responsibility.
The discussion references a 2019 government decree that identifies certain breeds as potentially dangerous. The list mentioned includes dogs such as the Akbash, American Bandog, Ambulldog, crosses involving wolfhounds, and the Brazilian Bulldog. The relevance of this decree is seen as the foundation for the new rule being considered, with authorities seeking to clarify which dogs fall under the designation and how that designation should be enforced in everyday settings.
Support for the proposed measure is expressed by a member of the State Duma who heads a health protection committee. This official notes that reports about incidents involving dogs of the potentially dangerous category come in with some frequency, with many of the cases affecting children. The concern is framed around public safety and the protection of vulnerable groups, prompting lawmakers to examine stricter controls to prevent future harm.
Officials have indicated that the Cabinet of Ministers backs the concept, provided the proposal is refined in accordance with government feedback before it proceeds to parliamentary consideration. The intent is to ensure that any policy changes are feasible, consistent with existing regulations, and clear in scope for both dog owners and enforcement agencies, reducing ambiguity in enforcement and improving safety outcomes for communities.
Earlier, the State Duma approved amendments to the law governing homeless animals. The proposed changes, moving through second and third readings, would introduce a ban on self-walking cats and dogs, a measure aimed at addressing risks associated with unsupervised pets in urban areas. This broader discussion around pet management reflects a push to align public safety with animal welfare, while also addressing the practical challenges faced by caregivers and local authorities when pets are left unsupervised in public spaces.
Additionally, opposition thinkers have discussed various policy options in related discussions, including broader constraints on financial support related to activities that may influence public safety or national security. While some lawmakers emphasize targeted protections, others argue for a measured approach that balances civil liberties with the need to curb dangerous occurrences involving animals. The overall conversation continues to evolve as policymakers weigh potential reforms against practical enforcement considerations and the experiences of communities dealing with animal-related incidents.