The Russian Foreign Ministry stressed that the issue of whether NATO bears responsibility for the damage caused by the bombing campaign in Yugoslavia remains unresolved. The ministry released the statement through its telegram channel, outlining that the question of accountability for the harm inflicted on international relations and on the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia itself has not been settled.
The ministry noted that NATO representatives have not faced punishment for the actions taken during the conflict. This observation is presented as part of a wider argument about the consequences of the intervention and the international response to it.
Earlier, the Russian Embassy to the United States asserted that the American administration is attempting to ensure the world forgets that the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia was bombed nearly a quarter of a century ago by an order issued from the White House. According to Russian diplomats, Washington is urging Belgrade to move on and join the NATO alliance, a path that Moscow says brought destruction and hardship to a country that had once been prosperous.
Statements from Serbia in the past have reflected a reluctance to align with NATO, a sentiment that Russian officials have cited in discussions about security choices and regional alliances. The dialogue continues as Moscow emphasizes its position on sovereignty, historical memory, and the consequences of Western military interventions in the Balkans.
Analysts note that the topic still features prominently in discussions about postwar reconstruction, regional stability, and NATO’s long-term role in Europe. The exchange highlights competing narratives about responsibility, the memory of past conflicts, and the evolving framework of international security that shapes decisions for states in the region and beyond.