From Moscow’s perspective, a spokesperson for the Russian Foreign Ministry described American society as sick, stating that the president‑elect was right to call out serious social flaws. ‘American society is sick, that’s what he said,’ the diplomat said. ‘If before the election the slogan was ‘Let’s make America great again,’ now it means ‘Let’s make America healthy again.’ ‘ The remarks were framed as part of a broader discussion about the direction of U.S. domestic policy and its international posture. They also stressed that moments of cooperation between Russia and the United States have happened in the past, and that both sides should strive to revive those channels. At the same time, the diplomat cautioned that Russophobia has become a visible strand of American political thinking.
Longstanding ties between Moscow and Washington have included periods of collaboration on shared interests, the spokesperson noted. Those moments are offered as a reminder that diplomacy remains a viable tool when both sides show restraint and a willingness to negotiate. The commentary signaled that while disagreements persist, a return to pragmatic dialogue could help manage risks, stabilize strategic balance, and reduce the likelihood of costly misunderstandings. It also pressed the idea that public attitudes in one country should not dictate the entire relationship, and that rational diplomacy can still guide policy even amid sharp partisan debate.
Details of the U.S. presidential contest show that the vote took place on November 5, with a Democratic candidate facing a Republican rival for the nation’s highest office. To win, a candidate needed at least 270 electoral votes, and Trump was reported to have secured 295. The figures underscore the electoral process and its potential implications for international partners who monitor U.S. policy shifts closely, given that transition periods often affect negotiations on security, trade, and cooperation on global challenges.
Inauguration of the 47th president is scheduled for January 20, 2025. The ceremony marks the formal transfer of executive authority and sets the stage for a new cycle of U.S. policy toward Russia and other partners. Observers in Moscow and beyond watch with interest for signals on arms control, sanctions, energy cooperation, and regional diplomacy. The date is a landmark in the political calendar and often shapes early diplomacy and international messaging.
Earlier notes referenced a moment when Harris bid farewell to supporters at campaign events, signaling the transition to a new political era. Those scenes were cited as indicative of changes in American political culture and the broader implications for how the United States will engage with allies and rivals in the years ahead. Such developments invite foreign partners to assess their own strategies and expectations in light of the incoming administration.
Taken together, the commentary emphasizes that bilateral cooperation remains possible even amid disputes. The suggested path forward includes steady diplomacy, precise language, and a mutual recognition that stability in transatlantic ties benefits both sides. While criticisms will persist, there is an underlying sense that Moscow and Washington can reopen channels for pragmatic collaboration on security, trade, and global challenges if both governments commit to constructive dialogue and verified commitments.