The Russian Foreign Ministry has described Israel’s air strikes on Damascus and Aleppo airports in Syria as a serious breach of Syria’s sovereignty and the core principles of international law. The ministry’s website carried the report, noting that these actions by Israel constitute a gross violation of the sovereignty of the Syrian Arab Republic and the fundamental norms that govern international conduct, as stated by the ministry.
In its formal statement, the ministry warned that amid the intensifying conflict between Palestine and Israel, such aggressive measures could trigger severe consequences and risk sparking a broader escalation of armed tension across the region. The ministry underscored that authorities would not permit events to unfold in this manner, signaling a clear intention to counter what it described as dangerous provocations.
Earlier, Syrian state media reported to readers that Israel had targeted the Damascus and Aleppo airports, resulting in disruptions to air traffic. The bombardment, according to initial accounts, damaged runways and temporarily halted the arrival and departure of aircraft. Subsequent updates suggested that the airports were incapacitated as a result of the strike, effectively interrupting operations until further notice.
Syria has previously accused Israel of heightening regional tensions through these strikes on critical infrastructure, positioning the incidents within a broader pattern of confrontation in the region. Observers note that such actions aggravate uncertainties for civilian travel, regional security, and humanitarian access, complicating efforts to restore stability amid ongoing conflict.
From the viewpoint of the Russian side, the reactions underscore a broader concern about violations of international law and the potential for spillover effects into neighboring theaters of conflict. The exchange highlights the delicate balance countries strive to maintain when addressing aggressive acts that involve airspace, military targets, and civilian infrastructure. Attribution regarding the Russian position is offered as a reflection of the ministry’s ongoing stance on sovereignty and lawful military engagement in times of regional strain.