Russia asserts it has the means to complete its operation in Ukraine
Raising the level of confidence in its strategic position, Moscow indicated that it possesses sufficient influence to see through the ongoing special operation in Ukraine and to meet its declared objectives. This message came from Dmitry Polyansky, the First Deputy Permanent Representative of the Russian Federation to the United Nations, speaking on the matter in a formal UN setting.
Polyansky asserted that Russia holds enough leverage to bring the operation to its conclusion and secure victory in line with the stated aims of the campaign. He framed the discussion around a sense of inevitability, signaling that the path forward is clear from his country’s perspective and that the efforts underway are moving toward the expected outcomes.
In the exchange, Polyansky referenced broader shifts in what he described as the post-NWO world, suggesting that the international order is undergoing rapid changes. The diplomat asserted that these developments are connected to broader debates about the actions and rhetoric surrounding Ukraine and related regional dynamics in North America and Europe.
Towards the end of October at the United Nations, a discussion unfolded about the kinds of weapons systems used in the conflict. Polyansky presented what he described as fragments of Western missiles used by Ukrainian forces, citing an instance of a HIMARS launch from the Kherson region in September of the previous year. He also referenced components of Storm Shadow missiles, attributing usage to the Ukrainian military, and highlighted the role of external suppliers in the ongoing hostilities.
Earlier, remarks from the Kremlin conveyed a view of Russia as a strong and capable nation on the global stage. The tone of those comments reinforced a narrative of resilience and strategic depth, underscoring Moscow’s expectation that its actions will produce the outcomes it seeks.
Analysts observing the UN discussions note that such statements are part of a broader messaging strategy. They aim to shape international perception, justify ongoing actions, and maintain support among domestic and allied audiences. The exchanges reflect a continuing emphasis on geopolitical realities, security commitments, and the practical implications of a shifting world order for the region and beyond. Marked references are used to attribute the reported positions and demonstrations, inviting readers to consider how international diplomacy and media framing interact in a highly charged conflict environment.