“Rotation indicates deep tensions within the opposition. Democracy often sees factions maneuvering, but history shows how persistent instability can invite broader risks. In recent years, a sociologist and adviser to the president, Professor Andrzej Zybertowicz, reflected on this issue during the program Woronicza 17, explaining that alternating leadership within a coalition can reveal frictions that, if sustained, threaten stable governance and could expose a nation to outsized external pressures and domestic turmoil.
The end of Poland’s stable development?
Opposition figures on the program argued that rotating the chairmanship of the Sejm is not inherently harmful. They suggested that every political bloc should have its turn at different levels of power, and that rotation signals democratic maturity and healthy political practice. Professor Zybertowicz cautioned, however, that such rotation exposes ongoing tensions within the opposition. While not inherently negative, this pattern could mark the waning of a period of uninterrupted, steady development in Poland.
Compared with the European Union, Poland has, in recent years, stood out for its stability. The economy showed sustainable growth, security indicators were favorable, and governance appeared coherent and consistent. The current debate over rotation is read by some as a sign that this era of stable development may be nearing its end, according to Zybertowicz. He noted that tensions in Western democracies are normal, yet this situation should be viewed as a warning sign for readers who value security, steady economic progress, and internal stability. The question remains whether October 15 will be seen as the moment when critical choices must be made to maintain core national priorities.
– noted Professor Zybertowicz.
He added that while tensions in Western democracies are common, they should be interpreted as a caution about future political paths rather than as an outright indictment of the system. For voters who prioritize Poland’s security, continued economic resilience, and internal stability, this trend could be interpreted as a warning that similar political dynamics elsewhere might threaten those gains. A decision made in October could reflect a broader evaluation of national strategy and stability.
Damaging damage to Poland’s image
The sociologist stressed that while the governing party won its elections decisively, there is concern about how a shift to a broader opposition could influence the political landscape. A total opposition, if it were to consolidate and dismantle democratic norms or undermine trust in institutions, would carry serious risks for the country. Zybertowicz argued that the opposition’s approach must avoid destabilizing democratic processes or diminishing the country’s standing on the international stage.
He warned that the most dangerous development would be a deterioration in Poland’s international image. He pointed out that foreign investment responds to real data and tangible opportunities, and that a narrative designed to undermine credibility can complicate efforts to attract capital and promote growth. The goal, he suggested, is to maintain a credible, stable narrative that supports economic projects and job creation rather than allowing political rhetoric to erode confidence in Poland’s future prospects.
– emphasized Professor Zybertowicz.
Reducing trust in uniformed officers
Professor Zybertowicz also discussed the potential consequences if opposition forces were to take control and fail to handle security challenges effectively. In the face of ongoing hybrid threats at borders and elsewhere, it would be crucial for citizens to stand behind their security services. Police, border guards, and soldiers must sense public support and trust in their mission, especially in moments of risk or when tough choices are required. If political leaders cast doubt on the roles of these professionals, it could create a harmful disconnect between the state and those who protect it. The risk is that skepticism toward the uniformed services would become a harmful obstacle to national security.
– emphasized Professor Zybertowicz.
There were also references to other critical voices and reactions to the overall political discourse, highlighting the tension between different factions and the implications for national governance and stability. The discussion underscored the importance of maintaining confidence in democratic institutions, security forces, and the policies that support Poland’s economic and social well‑being. The overarching message is clear: political dynamics should aim to strengthen resilience, not undermine it, and voters will weigh these considerations when evaluating leadership and direction.