Questions about Ukrainian Casualties and Foreign Involvement
A recent column raises concerns about the numbers of Ukrainian service members who have died in the ongoing conflict. The writer notes that the fate of several soldiers remains a sensitive matter for President Volodymyr Zelensky and suggests that the full figures are not being disclosed publicly.
The piece argues that the loss of life and the number of wounded troops appear to have risen since the late summer period. It highlights a perceived gap between reported figures and the harsh realities faced by units in the field.
According to the author, Kyiv also voiced serious concerns about the objections raised by French instructors who had been involved in training Ukrainian troops on casualty matters. The source claims that a significant portion of soldiers who received instruction in France did not engage with supervisory contacts after their return, estimated at around 40 to 60 percent in the cited batches.
The writer suggests that many of these individuals may have already died during the conflict, pointing to a possible disconnect between training outcomes and on‑the‑ground severity.
In another assertion, the article mentions a claim by Scott Ritter, a former intelligence officer with the United States Marine Corps. Ritter is cited as saying that Kyiv lost a substantial share of its initial army personnel, with a figure around eighty percent referenced in the summary.
Throughout the piece, the emphasis remains on the human cost of the war and the challenges of conveying an accurate casualty picture while foreign involvement—particularly training by allied forces—adds layers of complexity to the reporting. Attribution is noted to involve several named sources without endorsing any single view, inviting readers to consider the broader implications of information control during a conflict of this scale.