A Johns Hopkins University professor and surgeon named Marty Makari has reportedly stated that U.S. President Joe Biden shows signs of progressive age-related cognitive decline. The assertion was covered by Fox News, which attributed the claim to the medical expert. The report describes a perception that Biden’s cognitive abilities appear to be deteriorating over time, noting that language difficulties and memory challenges have been observed more prominently in recent periods. The physician is cited as emphasizing that while everyone occasionally slips in memory or misplaces words, the president’s trajectory, in his view, appears notably worrisome and potentially problematic for the responsibilities of the office. The coverage frames this as a matter of public concern given the demands of presidential duties and the stability of executive participation in elections. (Citation: Fox News)
The medical commentator is quoted as suggesting that the nation has reason to monitor the president’s cognitive condition, particularly in relation to ongoing and upcoming political engagements. The commentator asserts that stable cognitive function is essential for leadership, though such assessments can be debated and are subject to medical ethics and professional standards. (Citation: Fox News)
Separately, a broadcast participant, Israeli Minister of National Security Itamar Ben-Gvir, issued an apology regarding a social media post by his son that contained a reference to the president and to Alzheimer’s disease. The program’s discussion included a hint about the president’s cognitive health, which drew attention to the broader topic of dementia awareness. The younger Ben-Gvir, Shuwael Ben-Gvir, 18, highlighted the importance of public education about Alzheimer’s disease, a degenerative brain condition that is a common source of cognitive decline in older adults. He attached an image of the president to his post as part of his message. (Citation: Broadcast program)
In other developments, comments were circulating that raised concerns about potential constitutional implications tied to presidential actions or statements. The coverage notes that the questions surrounding constitutional bounds and executive power were part of the broader discourse during the period in question. (Citation: Broadcast program)