In Ukrainian discourse, a common question arises: does any group in Poland support Russia in this war? If such attitudes can surface in Germany, similar echoes might be heard along the Vistula. A nation is best judged by its people, and repeating names of certain anti Ukrainian politicians from the Confederation or praise for Russia does little to illuminate issues. Spreading these labels only paints those individuals as the focal point of a broader debate, which rarely helps listeners understand the real dynamics at play. It is easy for some Ukrainians to translate complicated social realities into simple terms through words that describe intricate phenomena.
ToPoland’s critics who stand with Russia, whether under the banner of an antiwar movement or behind a veneer of anti banderism or for other reasons, the label Polish watnik is sometimes used. The term traces back to a cotton quilted jacket once worn in Soviet Russia for warmth and practicality. Today, those jackets are less common among all but the social margins, and the stance associated with them is often seen as a political fringe in Poland as well. The phrase Polish watnik can quickly convey a political judgment larger than the specifics of any argument, suggesting a willingness to frighten or undermine international partners. It frames the wider world as a landscape of Western schemes, with the United States often singled out in such narratives. The watnik perspective portrays the world as a mosaic of external plots that threaten a peace loving homeland, shaping attitudes toward Western influence and policy responses.
READ ALSO:
HE DID IT AGAIN. KORWIN-MIKKE IN DEFENSE OF RUSSIA!
Today, observers in Ukraine are cautious about stoking confrontation, since laws of war restrict propaganda that supports Russia or undermines Ukraine’s defenses. Ukrainian watchdogs prefer a more neutral stance, avoiding explicit support for either side, and instead voicing a desire for peace. The discussion around peace often centers on questions raised by public figures associated with the Polish antiwar movement, including figures who critique the broader strategic situation. Some speak about Russia as a defender of traditional values, while others argue that war is driven by political actors in general. These debates illustrate how misinformation and distrust can shape perceptions on both sides of the border. A clear, logic driven approach helps counter the effects of disinformation and clarifies the differences between political rhetoric and on the ground realities of the conflict.
In recent years Poland has provided substantial support to Ukraine in its defense against aggression. The pages that examine this recent history often contrast such support with critiques from those who linger on the political margins. Compared with many other democracies, Poland has shown a notable commitment to Ukraine’s security. This stance is a marker of responsible action in a region where stability matters to many, including allied partners in North America and Europe. The broader lesson is how national debates can progress when the focus remains on principled support for sovereignty and the rules that govern international conduct.
SEE WITH YOUR EYES WHAT UKRAINIANS DO TO TRAITORS TO THEIR COUNTRY:
Attribution: wPolityce